2012
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2011.300306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injury Surveillance in New York City Jails

Abstract: To characterize injuries occurring in jails, we analyzed injury report forms from the New York City jail system. We abstracted data from 4695 injury report forms representing 3863 patients. Of the injuries reported, 66% were classified as intentional. The 2 leading causes of injuries were inmate-on-inmate aggression (40%) and slips and falls (27%). Injuries place a considerable burden on jail health care systems, and there is a need for more studies on this problem and development of injury prevention programs. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
18
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…24 There is a scarcity of medical reports on injuries suffered at the hands of prison violence. 26,27 The "enhancement of capacity for collecting data on violence" by health care staff (as recommended by the WHO 8 ) and the "systematic recording and compiling of periodic statistics" on violence by health care professionals working in prisons (as proposed by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment and Punishment (CPT), 3 are lacking in most correctional facilities. As one unique example, the 2010 Clinical Indicators of Sexual Violence in Custody study (U.S. National Institute of Justice and the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention) did propose the use of medical indicators and medical surveillance methodologies for the collection of sexual assault data in prison on a national level.…”
Section: What Do We Know? Definition Prevalence and The Impact Of Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 There is a scarcity of medical reports on injuries suffered at the hands of prison violence. 26,27 The "enhancement of capacity for collecting data on violence" by health care staff (as recommended by the WHO 8 ) and the "systematic recording and compiling of periodic statistics" on violence by health care professionals working in prisons (as proposed by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment and Punishment (CPT), 3 are lacking in most correctional facilities. As one unique example, the 2010 Clinical Indicators of Sexual Violence in Custody study (U.S. National Institute of Justice and the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention) did propose the use of medical indicators and medical surveillance methodologies for the collection of sexual assault data in prison on a national level.…”
Section: What Do We Know? Definition Prevalence and The Impact Of Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23---25 Violence is prevalent in jail, including traumatic brain injury, which may potentiate behavioral problems and substance use. 26,27 Moreover, self-harm is common in jail and is promoted by features of the jail environment such as solitary confinement. 28 Jails have been shown to drive the community-level epidemiology of some communicable diseases, with the highest incidence among the frequently incarcerated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Online for appendix Of these, 66% (486 per 1000 person years) were violent or intentional acts. 4 Using this rate as a national proxy, we estimate that 58 400 new intentional injuries occur in jail and 70 956 in prison each year.…”
Section: Sexual Abuse and Injury During Incarceration Reveal The Needmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were enrolled on this trial if they were "unsuitable for surgical resection or stereotactic radiotherapy", yet approximately two-thirds of patients had four lesions or fewer; recently published randomised trials [2][3][4][5] indicate that few situations exist in which patients with four brain metastases or fewer should be treated with WBRT as opposed to stereotactic radiation. Had this study started enrolment in 2016, it is plausible that few patients would have met eligibility criteria.…”
Section: Dana-farber Cancer Institute Holds Fundraiser At Trump Estatementioning
confidence: 99%