Abstract:Background: Fear of reinjury is common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and often deters a return to preinjury sport participation. A better understanding of injury-related fear is needed to inform rehabilitation strategies. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to (1) identify individual fear-evoking tasks or situations, (2) compare the intensity and amount of change relative to other injury-related fears (reinjury, knee giving way, and knee pain) after completion of a return… Show more
“…The more active the patients are to participate, the better the training effect will be. Rehabilitation training should maximize the number of repetitions of training and maximize the active efforts of patients, which is one of the most widely accepted principles in the field of rehabilitation clinical and rehabilitation engineering [ 8 ]. However, in the robot-assisted rehabilitation training, the robot mainly adopts an adaptive control algorithm to assist the patient, which allows the patient to reduce their active efforts, which leads to the patient slackening, inertia, and reduced rehabilitation effect.…”
To realize the remote monitoring design in the process of rehabilitation training for athletes after an injury using computer technology, using Visual Studio 2010 development platform, and using ASP as the development language, NET as the development framework, the injury rehabilitation of injured athletes for dynamic monitoring of information management system, and its functions, system architecture and other detailed design. This article identified six laboratory workers outside the sample as experimental subjects. The experimental subjects’ blood oxygen flow, degree, and rate were measured in the normal condition, and the pulse wave was recorded. Then, the upper and lower limbs rehabilitation training robot developed by the laboratory was used for about 15 minutes of rehabilitation training with 3-gear difficulty. The results show that the data measured by the system are the same as the data measured by the Lu Yue brand finger clip type YX301 blood oxygen saturation detector and meet the design requirements. Conclusion. The monitoring accuracy of the system is high, the resistance signal waveform is basically consistent with the actual waveform, and the monitoring effect is good.
“…The more active the patients are to participate, the better the training effect will be. Rehabilitation training should maximize the number of repetitions of training and maximize the active efforts of patients, which is one of the most widely accepted principles in the field of rehabilitation clinical and rehabilitation engineering [ 8 ]. However, in the robot-assisted rehabilitation training, the robot mainly adopts an adaptive control algorithm to assist the patient, which allows the patient to reduce their active efforts, which leads to the patient slackening, inertia, and reduced rehabilitation effect.…”
To realize the remote monitoring design in the process of rehabilitation training for athletes after an injury using computer technology, using Visual Studio 2010 development platform, and using ASP as the development language, NET as the development framework, the injury rehabilitation of injured athletes for dynamic monitoring of information management system, and its functions, system architecture and other detailed design. This article identified six laboratory workers outside the sample as experimental subjects. The experimental subjects’ blood oxygen flow, degree, and rate were measured in the normal condition, and the pulse wave was recorded. Then, the upper and lower limbs rehabilitation training robot developed by the laboratory was used for about 15 minutes of rehabilitation training with 3-gear difficulty. The results show that the data measured by the system are the same as the data measured by the Lu Yue brand finger clip type YX301 blood oxygen saturation detector and meet the design requirements. Conclusion. The monitoring accuracy of the system is high, the resistance signal waveform is basically consistent with the actual waveform, and the monitoring effect is good.
“…This agrees with findings of no change in TSK-11 scores after plyometric training administered at an earlier timeframe post ACLR, 24 and persistent injury-related fears after advanced training. 26 Further research is needed to determine alternative ACLR rehabilitation approaches to address injury-related fear. It is possible that graded exposure treatment approach, which identifies and hierarchically exposes patients to their specific fear, might be needed to address injury-related fear as it has shown benefit for other fears and phobias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22] These programs usually target the 6-12 months postoperative time period and generally include lower extremity strengthening and neuromuscular training (agility, perturbations and/or plyometrics) at an increased intensity level compared to standard rehabilitation. 16,23 Research has shown that potential benefits of advanced training include improved function, [22][23][24] improved passing rate on return to sport criteria consisting of physical impairment and psychological measures, 16 and possibly prevention of secondary (re)-injury 22,25 Even without an explicit psychological intervention, previous studies have shown that patients who complete advanced training have improved overall psychological readiness for sport participation 26 and improved selfefficacy for knee-related activities. 24 To our knowledge, no study has directly compared physical and psychological outcomes in patients that did or did not participate in advanced training during the return to sport phase following ACLR.…”
Patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are often psychologically and physically under-prepared for sports participation. This study compared readiness to return to sport based on completion of advanced training after ACLR. Patients with ACLR who self-selected participation in a 6-week group-format advanced training program (TRAINING) were compared to age-and sex-matched patients who did not participate (NoTRAINING). Each group had 23 participants (14 females). Advanced training consisted of plyometric, strengthening, and agility exercises. Baseline and follow-up testing included psychological measures (Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury [ACL-RSI]; Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia [TSK-11]; Knee Activity Self-Efficacy [KASE]; and fear intensity for the primary fear-evoking task or situation) and a hop test battery. Return to sport criteria were ACL-RSI score ≥70 points and limb symmetry index ≥90% on all hop tests. At follow-up, KASE score was higher in TRAINING than NoTRAINING (92.7 vs. 89.1 points; respectively), but ACL-RSI, TSK-11 and fear intensity scores were not significantly different between groups. Return to sport criteria passing rate was not significantly different between groups at baseline (TRAINING: 13%, NoTRAINING: 30%) or follow-up (TRAINING: 52%, NoTRAINING: 43%); however, the distribution of criteria met at follow-up differed with more patients in TRAIN-ING than NoTRAINING meeting hop test criteria (30% vs. 4%, respectively) and more patients in NoTRAINING than TRAINING failing to meet any criteria (25% vs. 0%, respectively). Advanced training after ACLR facilitated readiness for sport participation by improving confidence and hop performance, but may not have a preferential effect on fear.
“…36 From a psychological perspective, the return-to-sport phase after ACL reconstruction surgery has been shown to be particularly challenging for some athletes, as negative emotions can be heightened at this time and can even lead to an avoidance of return to play. 3,24 It has been estimated that up to half of athletes do not return to competitive sport after ACL reconstruction surgery. 2 Published in 2008, the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale was developed as a tool to evaluate psychological readiness to return to sport after ACL injury, and it is currently the only scale specific to ACL injury.…”
Background: The Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale is a reliable and valid tool for evaluation of psychological readiness to return to sport after ACL injury, but its responsiveness to change has not been extensively evaluated. Purpose: To determine the responsiveness of the ACL-RSI scale. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The ACL-RSI scale and the knee confidence question from the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score–Quality of Life subscale was completed at 6 and 12 months after ACL reconstruction surgery. Responsiveness was assessed using distribution and anchor-based methods for the full- and short-form versions of the scale and subgroup analyzed for sex. From distribution statistics, the standardized response mean (SRM) and the smallest detectable change (SDC) were calculated. Using the anchor-based method, the minimally important change (MIC) that was associated with an improvement in knee confidence was determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: A total of 441 patients (257 men, 184 women; mean age of 25 years) were included in this study. An SRM of 0.7 was found for both versions, indicating a moderate level of responsiveness. The MIC was 13.4 points for the full-form version and 15.1 points for the short-form version. These values were larger than SDC values at the group level but not at the individual patient level. Responsiveness was similar between male and female patients. Conclusion: The ACL-RSI scale had sufficient responsiveness to investigate the efficacy of an intervention at a group level, but it may be more limited at an individual patient level.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.