2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injury patterns and outcomes in bicycle-related maxillofacial traumata: A retrospective analysis of 162 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The facial region was at a 75‐fold risk of fracture relative to the head. The apparent inefficacy of helmets in protecting from facial injuries is consistent with other studies 14,18,22–24 . Stier et al sought to determine whether bicycle helmets protected against facial injuries in a retrospective study on 7004 bicycle accidents, in which facial injuries were suffered in 1005 (14.3%) of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The facial region was at a 75‐fold risk of fracture relative to the head. The apparent inefficacy of helmets in protecting from facial injuries is consistent with other studies 14,18,22–24 . Stier et al sought to determine whether bicycle helmets protected against facial injuries in a retrospective study on 7004 bicycle accidents, in which facial injuries were suffered in 1005 (14.3%) of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The rate of reported helmet use has varied widely in the literature largely due to differences in study methodologies. Studies among cyclists of all ages who suffered head or facial injuries have identified rates of use of helmets as 11.8%, 18 21.3%, 19 22.0%, 20 25.1%, 21 33.3%, 22 and 60.6% 23 . However, when studies have limited the study sample to children, helmet use was relatively higher, with rates as high as >50.0% 24 and 74.4% 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They found that although alcohol use was higher in the conventional bicycle group (32% vs. 16%), E-bikers sustained midfacial fractures more frequently (47% vs. 34%). Gülses et al [ 19 ] collected data from 162 injured bicycle riders, 86 of them presented with at least one maxillofacial fracture. The overall ratio of the number of the fracture line/fracture case was 2.80.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As fraturas mandibulares seguiram a classificação descrita por SCHNEIDER et al 2015;ZAMBONI et al 2017;RAMPA et al, 2019;MOREIRA et al 2019;HENNOCQ et al 2019;PATEL et al 2020;PORTO et al 2020;JABER et al 2021;GOH et al 2021;MERAN, 2021;REICHA, W.;AUSTB, O.;ECKERTA, A. 2021;ESSOBIYOU et al 2022;GÜLSES et al 2022;MUNIR, A.;MOBARAK, D. 2022;PRIORE et al 2022;SINGLETON et al 2022;REJEB, et al 2022;ROCCIA, et al 2022;). Se observou também que a faixa etária com maior incidência 18 a 29 anos, se tratando assim de um adulto jovem, tendo uma média de idade do paciente atendido de 30 ± 13,7 anos, corroborando com outros estudos já realizados (BHARANI, S. et al, 2015;SCHNEIDER et al 2015;ZAMBONI et al 2017;RAMPA et al, 2019;MERAN, 2021;MOREIRA et al 2019;PATEL et al 2020;ALTUNTAS et al 2021;ESSOBIYOU et al 2022;GÜLSES et al 2022;PRIORE et al 2022;SINGLETON et al 2022;REJEB, et al 2022;ROCCIA, et al 2022;) Ao se analisar os traumas faciais as fraturas notadas no estado de Roraima se caracterizaram em sua maioria se tratarem de fraturas mandibulares com a maior incidência dos casos (52,82%).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified