2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injury incidence rates of cyclists compared to pedestrians, car occupants and powered two-wheeler riders, using a medical registry and mobility data, Rhône County, France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
28
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Three retrospective studies (Mindell et al, 2012;Blaizot et al, 2013;Tin Tin et al, 2011) included all ages and another (Tin Tin et al, 2010) included participants aged 5 years or older. These studies used a telephone questionnaire administered by a national institution to obtain information about traveling data.…”
Section: Retrospective Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Three retrospective studies (Mindell et al, 2012;Blaizot et al, 2013;Tin Tin et al, 2011) included all ages and another (Tin Tin et al, 2010) included participants aged 5 years or older. These studies used a telephone questionnaire administered by a national institution to obtain information about traveling data.…”
Section: Retrospective Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This included aspects such as helmet use, clothing, and use of lights when riding in the dark (Mindell et al, 2012;Bacchieri et al, 2010;Blaizot et al, 2013;Thornley et al, 2008;Tin Tin et al, 2010;Hoffman et al, 2010;Johnson et al, 2010;Poulos et al, 2012). These factors were assessed through questionnaires, often those that were used to assess exposure.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Bicycle Accidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Safety impact models therefore sometimes apply nonlinear crash risk functions, which reflect that with increasing levels of cycling (through whatever measures), crash rates increase less than cycling levels (Schepers & Heinen, 2013;Woodcock et al, 2013), a phenomenon referred to as 'safety in numbers' (Elvik, 2009;Jacobsen, 2003). While this relationship has been observed widely (Blaizot, Papon, Haddak, & Amoros, 2013;Elvik, 2009;Gotschi, 2011;Jacobsen, 2003;OECD & International Transport Forum, 2013;Robinson, 2005), its interpretation has been criticized for being too focused on one of the two possible causal directions -the higher number of cyclists improving safety -while equally, more safety increasing the numbers of cyclists ('numbers in safety') would, and likely has, lead to the same nonlinear relationship (Bhatia & Wier, 2011). Pathways in both directions are plausible, but there is no research available that could quantify the pathway-specific contributions to safety or numbers, respectively.…”
Section: Crash Risk From Cyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a study in the United States found that compared with car occupants, pedestrians and cyclists were 23 and 12 times more likely to be killed per kilometre travelled (75). A study in the Rhode County in France found that compared with car occupants, cyclists were three times more likely to be killed per time travelled, eight times more likely to be injured and 16 times more likely to be seriously injured (76). For pedestrians, this study indicated that despite being half as likely to be injured in a road accident, they were twice as likely to be seriously injured compared with car occupants.…”
Section: The Be and Road Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%