“…Three studies [ 14 , 15 , 73 ] utilised the athlete exposures (AEs) rate and two of these three studies [ 15 , 73 ] reported on match injuries. Other studies were reviewed but were excluded as they were not peer reviewed [ 75 – 77 ], reported on a specific injury [ 67 , 78 – 85 ], did not stratify the results by sex [ 86 – 90 ], did not report concussions [ 12 ] or exposure rates [ 91 ], assessed injuries as a result of foul play [ 92 ], utilised a self-reporting survey [ 87 , 92 , 93 ], reported on the costs [ 52 – 55 , 94 , 95 ], reported previously included data [ 6 , 67 , 68 , 96 – 99 ], or were reviews [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 9 , 100 – 102 ]. Reviewer inter-rater reliability was assessed as strong ( κ = 0.84; p < 0.0001) between two of the reviewers.…”