2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injuries in England and Wales elite men’s domestic cricket: A nine season review from 2010 to 2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a regular domestic cricket season, injury surveillance in Australia [4] and England and Wales [5], has produced generally consistent findings. There is greater risk with the shorter one-day competition formats (e.g., One-day and T20 cricket) compared to the longer multi-day first-class format (4-Day).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a regular domestic cricket season, injury surveillance in Australia [4] and England and Wales [5], has produced generally consistent findings. There is greater risk with the shorter one-day competition formats (e.g., One-day and T20 cricket) compared to the longer multi-day first-class format (4-Day).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Bowling is generally the activity that results in the most time loss injuries [4][5]. However, this was not found for domestic T20 in England and Wales, where fielding was the activity that resulted in the most time loss injuries between the 2010-2018 seasons [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would be despite continuous player monitoring with comparatively similar (or slightly less) cricket being played, as identified by previous research. 28 However, it may be that injury rates are consistent because of the continuous efforts and a lack of monitoring would result in an increase in injury rates but this is just speculation and would be difficult to test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prevalence estimates suggest that low back injuries may be as high as 67%, with the fast bowling technique believed to offer some explanation for the high injury risk [ 12 , 13 , 18 , 19 , 25 , 28 ]. Recent match injury incidence further suggests fast bowling was accountable for the most injuries reported, 41.6 injuries/1000 days of play [ 20 ]. Previous research has demonstrated links between fast bowling spinal kinematics and low back pain and injury [ 1 , 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%