Injuries Associated with Physical Agents

Munro, Ranald

doi:10.1016/b978-0-7020-2878-6.50019-2

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2013

2018

Publication Types

Select...

Book3

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… As a consequence of this intensive patrol routine, ‘each section officer got into the habit of doing the same patrol each time he was on duty’. In turn, ‘This was not lost on the other side … [and] it was easy for them to find out which section would be patrolling on any day some days ahead … in this way … plans were made to ambush No. 2 Section’.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

‘The other boys of Kilmichael’: No. 2 Section, ‘C’ Company, Auxiliary Division Royal Irish Constabulary, 28 November 1920

Nelson

2014

Hist Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Kilmichael incident of November 1920, in which an Irish Republican Army (I.R.A.) column of nearly forty men ambushed and killed all bar one of a motorized patrol of eighteen Auxiliary Division Royal Irish Constabulary cadets, proved to be one of the I.R.A.'s most noted victories of the Anglo‐Irish War. Recent historiography has been dominated by controversy over the late Peter Hart's 1998 conclusion that contemporary British claims of I.R.A. mutilation of the cadet's dead bodies were true. However, this article aims to demonstrate that studying other aspects of Kilmichael, such as the British unit, can enable a broader understanding of both the ambush, and of contemporary British policy concerns.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%