2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2013.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injecting pure N2 and CO2 to coal for enhanced coalbed methane: Experimental observations and numerical simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is consistent with the core flooding results of Connell et al (2011) where binary mixtures were accurately represented with the extended Langmuir model but ternary gas mixtures were subject to greater error. This compares with Zhou et al (2013) who found that extended Langmuir worked well for N 2 ECBM but was less accurate for CO 2 ECBM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This conclusion is consistent with the core flooding results of Connell et al (2011) where binary mixtures were accurately represented with the extended Langmuir model but ternary gas mixtures were subject to greater error. This compares with Zhou et al (2013) who found that extended Langmuir worked well for N 2 ECBM but was less accurate for CO 2 ECBM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…To further that aim and constrain the use of history matching, many properties are measured independently of the core flooding experiments. The current work extends that of Zhou et al (2013) by investigating the models used to represent diffusive exchange between matrix and cleat, using a permeability model specifically developed for hydrostatic conditions and conducting reverse core floods and also repeat core floods to verify observed behaviours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Enhanced coalbed methane recovery (ECBM) is the most common method used to solve this problem, such as CO 2 injection, hydraulic slotting, and hydraulic fracturing (Czerw et al, 2016;Jamshidi and Jessen, 2012;Lin et al, 2015;Prusty, 2008, Saghafi, 2010Zhou et al, 2013;Zou et al, 2014). However, these methods have unavoidable limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the permeability tests were conducted only with nitrogen and carbon dioxide; methane, the gas of main concern in underground coal mining, was not tested. The influence of gas adsorption on permeability was not considered in the test either, which influenced the accuracy of the results, as coal permeability is pressure-dependent due to different degrees of gas adsorption (Zhou et al, 2013a(Zhou et al, , 2013b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%