2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injectate spread in ESP block: A review of anatomical investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent literature has reported that different volumes of local anesthetic injectate and its corresponding spread are influenced by the site of injection. For example, a 5 mL of injectate was needed to cover one vertebral level in the lumbar region, whereas only 3.3 (radiological imaging studies) to 3.5 (cadaveric dissections studies) mL are needed in thoracic region [45]. In our study, we found that patients who underwent spine or orthopedic surgeries compared to control experienced clinical pain relief at 6 h which dissipated by 12 h after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Recent literature has reported that different volumes of local anesthetic injectate and its corresponding spread are influenced by the site of injection. For example, a 5 mL of injectate was needed to cover one vertebral level in the lumbar region, whereas only 3.3 (radiological imaging studies) to 3.5 (cadaveric dissections studies) mL are needed in thoracic region [45]. In our study, we found that patients who underwent spine or orthopedic surgeries compared to control experienced clinical pain relief at 6 h which dissipated by 12 h after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…It consists of an injection of the local anesthetic in a fascial plane placed between erector spinae muscles and the tip of the transverse vertebral process [1]. The anesthetic spreads over the fascial plane both in the cranial and caudal direction, also diffusing anteriorly and laterally at several levels by one dermatome per 3.4 mL of injected liquid [2]. It provides analgesia in a wide range of different clinical scenarios [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, craniocaudal spread of ESPB is more limited in the lumbar region when compared to the thoracic region. 13 Craniocaudal spreading is related to the spreading in the fascial plane, but due to the size of the vertebra, the area of the fascial plane where the LA will spread (in proportion to the muscle size), the differences observed in the structure of the fascia between the thoracic and lumbar regions, and the differences in the anatomical barriers that may be effective in the transition to the anterior region. In a review in the literature where anatomical investigations are evaluated, it is stated that; a median of 3.3 mL of local anesthetic was needed to cover one vertebral level when considering the whole vertebral column, whereas 2.5 mL was needed for thoracic and 5 mL were needed for the lumbar area.…”
Section: Anatomic Considerations In Espbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review in the literature where anatomical investigations are evaluated, it is stated that; a median of 3.3 mL of local anesthetic was needed to cover one vertebral level when considering the whole vertebral column, whereas 2.5 mL was needed for thoracic and 5 mL were needed for the lumbar area. 13 It should be kept in mind that as the application point is deeper and more latera, lumbar ESPB is more challenging to perform and to more difficult to sonographicallyvisualize when compared to thoracic applications. 14…”
Section: Anatomic Considerations In Espbmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation