2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injectable nanomedicine hydrogel for local chemotherapy of glioblastoma after surgical resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary disadvantage of these hydrogels is the foreign body response, which eventually leads to isolation of the implant through formation of a fibrous capsule that can induce patient discomfort and disruption of nanocarrier release kinetics 23 , 25 . To enhance tolerability of nanocarrier-loaded hydrogels, alternative strategies have emerged that include hydrogels composed of non-covalently linked nanocarriers themselves without polymer matrices 26 , as well as hydrogels composed of polymers with reduced inflammatory potential 24 , 27 . We sought to combine and improve upon both these strategies by developing a synthetic macromolecular hydrogel network that could dynamically restructure into monodisperse nanoscale vehicles for non-inflammatory bioresporption and sustained nanocarrier delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary disadvantage of these hydrogels is the foreign body response, which eventually leads to isolation of the implant through formation of a fibrous capsule that can induce patient discomfort and disruption of nanocarrier release kinetics 23 , 25 . To enhance tolerability of nanocarrier-loaded hydrogels, alternative strategies have emerged that include hydrogels composed of non-covalently linked nanocarriers themselves without polymer matrices 26 , as well as hydrogels composed of polymers with reduced inflammatory potential 24 , 27 . We sought to combine and improve upon both these strategies by developing a synthetic macromolecular hydrogel network that could dynamically restructure into monodisperse nanoscale vehicles for non-inflammatory bioresporption and sustained nanocarrier delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that the clinical success of Gliadel not only provides a rationale for this delivery mode, but that such significant efficacy (albeit modest), has not been reported for any molecular targeted monotherapy trialed for GBM. Indeed, there has been a resurgence of efficacious intracavity delivery of repurposed agents using biomaterials in preclinical orthotopic brain tumor models (43)(44)(45)(46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 61 ] Another intratumoral drug delivery system, described by Bastianchich et al., consists of lipid nanocapsule (LNC) hydrogels comprised of the chemotherapy drug Germcitabine (GemC 12 ) with lauroyl surfactant (GemC 12 ‐LNCs) ( Figure a). [ 62 ] This antitumor strategy significantly increased mouse survival compared to untreated controls (Figure 4b,c). Additionally, when injected in the surgical cavity postresection, GemC 12 ‐LNC hydrogel delayed tumor recurrence (Figure 4d).…”
Section: Pillars Of Gbm Treatment Improved By Injectable Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 94%