2017
DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000001206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injectable DaxibotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines: A Phase 2, Randomized, Dose-Ranging, Double-Blind, Multicenter Comparison With OnabotulinumtoxinA and Placebo

Abstract: The 40U dose of daxibotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated (e.g., absence of ptosis) and had the most favorable risk: benefit profile. Compared with 20U onabotulinumtoxinA, it exhibited a significantly greater response rate and a significantly longer duration of response (median of 24 weeks vs 19 weeks; p = .030).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of available preclinical data, a BoNT formulation containing as little clostridial protein as possible is desirable as it may avoid stimulating the host immune response leading to nAb formation and clinical nonresponse [1]. Three BoNT-A products are approved by the FDA for therapeutic use: onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A; BotoxÒ; Allergan Pharmaceuticals), abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A; Dys-portÒ; Ipsen Biopharm Ltd; Galderma Ltd), and incobotulinumtoxinA (incoBoNT-A; XeominÒ; Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH) [17][18][19]; a fourth BoNT-A product, daxibotulinumtoxinA (dax-iBoNT-A; Revance Therapeutics), is currently under regulatory review for a nontherapeutic indication [72]. These products vary in the amount of accessory proteins and the excipients (e.g., albumin; Table 1) [17][18][19].…”
Section: Immunogenicity Of Accessory Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of available preclinical data, a BoNT formulation containing as little clostridial protein as possible is desirable as it may avoid stimulating the host immune response leading to nAb formation and clinical nonresponse [1]. Three BoNT-A products are approved by the FDA for therapeutic use: onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A; BotoxÒ; Allergan Pharmaceuticals), abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A; Dys-portÒ; Ipsen Biopharm Ltd; Galderma Ltd), and incobotulinumtoxinA (incoBoNT-A; XeominÒ; Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH) [17][18][19]; a fourth BoNT-A product, daxibotulinumtoxinA (dax-iBoNT-A; Revance Therapeutics), is currently under regulatory review for a nontherapeutic indication [72]. These products vary in the amount of accessory proteins and the excipients (e.g., albumin; Table 1) [17][18][19].…”
Section: Immunogenicity Of Accessory Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Injectable daxibotulinumtoxinA (RT002) is an investigational BoNT that is in clinical development for the treatment of cervical dystonia, glabellar lines,5 and plantar fasciitis 6. Injectable daxibotulinumtoxinA is a purified 150 kDa BoNT type A (RTT150) that is devoid of accessory proteins and formulated with a proprietary stabilizing excipient peptide (RTP004) in a lyophilized powder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical studies, injectable daxibotulinumtoxinA has shown a prolonged duration of response in the treatment of glabellar lines5, 9—with a significantly longer median duration of response than onabotulinumtoxinA (24 weeks versus 19 weeks; p = 0.030) when daxibotulinumtoxinA was used at the dose being evaluated in phase 3 glabellar line trials (40 U) and onabotulinumtoxinA was used at the dose for which it is approved for glabellar lines (20 U) 5…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A phase 2 open-label trial of daxibotulinumtoxinA in 33 patients with CD noted a mean duration of effect of 25.3 weeks, longer than typical effect durations of other BoNT-A formulations [34]. A similar prolonged effect was noted in another phase 2 trial examining its use in the treatment of glabellar lines [39]. These findings, however, must be confirmed by larger, phase 3 studies that are currently being conducted in multiple centers.…”
Section: Botulinum Toxin Structure and Functionmentioning
confidence: 91%