2011
DOI: 10.4161/trns.2.6.18747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initiating RNA Polymerase II and TIPs as hallmarks of enhancer activity and tissue-specificity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have also shown that enhancers themselves are broadly transcribed, resulting in the production of enhancer-derived RNAs (eRNAs) (De Santa et al, 2010; Kim et al, 2010; Koch and Andrau, 2011; Lam et al, 2014). Given that transcription is generally associated with H3K4me3 (Vermeulen et al, 2007; Wysocka et al, 2006), we therefore wished to determine whether the switch from H3K4me1 to H3K4me3 in the absence of RACK7 also influenced local transcription of eRNAs at target enhancers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have also shown that enhancers themselves are broadly transcribed, resulting in the production of enhancer-derived RNAs (eRNAs) (De Santa et al, 2010; Kim et al, 2010; Koch and Andrau, 2011; Lam et al, 2014). Given that transcription is generally associated with H3K4me3 (Vermeulen et al, 2007; Wysocka et al, 2006), we therefore wished to determine whether the switch from H3K4me1 to H3K4me3 in the absence of RACK7 also influenced local transcription of eRNAs at target enhancers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relies on the assumption that in vitro (nuclear run-on) determination of the activity of RNA polymerases (RNAPs) is a reliable indicator of transcriptional activation. This has been proven in other systems and leads to the identification of active enhancers in other cell types (Koch and Andrau 2011;Wang et al 2011;Bonn et al 2012), although systematic comparisons or crossvalidation with other methods such as subcellular RNA fractionation (Bhatt et al 2012) has not been done. The usage of GRO-seq for the determination of direct transcriptional responses has two major advantages: (1) The dynamics of the nascent RNA levels depends only on the rate of RNAP activity, and therefore it is matching the expected time course of a directly regulated gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhancers have recently been defined as discrete genomic sites harboring a local combination of open chromatin structure (hypersensitivity to DNAse I), specific covalent histone modifications like mono-and di-methylation of histone 3 lysine 4 (H3K4me1, H3K4me2), acetylation of H3K27, low levels of H3K4me3, and RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) and transcription factor (TF) occupancy. [1][2][3] Based on this epigenetic definition, thousands of potential enhancers were localized genome-wide, some of which have been functionally validated in vivo. 4 current dominant model for long-range transcriptional regulation proposes that distal enhancers are brought into physical proximity to their target genes in the threedimensional nuclear space by chromatin looping mechanisms.…”
Section: Transcription Regulation By Distal Enhancersmentioning
confidence: 99%