2020
DOI: 10.1037/tep0000252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initiating a DBT consultation team: Conceptual and practical considerations for training clinics.

Abstract: As the evidence base for dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) grows, so too does the need for well-trained DBT clinicians, especially in practice settings that serve populations at high-risk for self-injurious behavior or suicide. Despite the increased availability of resources for learning and applying DBT to such high-risk individuals, comparatively little has been written about initiating DBT training for new therapists in settings where DBT services are being established for the first time. The purpose of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since this study, there has been little follow-up. Although there are a few reports on implementing training in personality disorders in psychology department clinics (Noll et al, 2020;Rizvi et al, 2017) and several more within residency programs (e.g., Bernstein et al, 2015;Unruh & Gunderson, 2016;Zerbo et al, 2013), we did not find empirical reports of the scope of training in personality disorders in clinical psychology programs beyond those in Magnavita et al (2010).…”
contrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Since this study, there has been little follow-up. Although there are a few reports on implementing training in personality disorders in psychology department clinics (Noll et al, 2020;Rizvi et al, 2017) and several more within residency programs (e.g., Bernstein et al, 2015;Unruh & Gunderson, 2016;Zerbo et al, 2013), we did not find empirical reports of the scope of training in personality disorders in clinical psychology programs beyond those in Magnavita et al (2010).…”
contrasting
confidence: 71%