2003
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2003.809473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial test results of an ionization chamber shower detector for a LHC luminosity monitor

Abstract: Abstract-A novel segmented, multi-gap, pressurized gas ionization chamber is being developed for optimization of the luminosity of the LHC. The ionization chambers are to be installed in the front quadrupole and zero degree neutral particle absorbers in the high luminosity IRs and sample the energy deposited near the maxima of the hadronic/electromagnetic showers in these absorbers. The ionization chambers are instrumented with low noise, fast, pulse shaping electronics to be capable of resolving individual bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the possible explanations for this feature are unexpected particle production in front of the detector such as particle collisions with the beam pipe, a longer distance between the end of the beam pipe and the detector or other systematic features which were not taken into account for in the simulation. Experimental and simulated data also agree well with the data taken at a previous test [5] performed at the SPS with 300GeV beam energy and a slightly different detector design. However, scaling the result of 4.4mV up to 350GeV one would expect the signal at shower maximum around 5.1mV.…”
Section: A Absorber Scan At the Spssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the possible explanations for this feature are unexpected particle production in front of the detector such as particle collisions with the beam pipe, a longer distance between the end of the beam pipe and the detector or other systematic features which were not taken into account for in the simulation. Experimental and simulated data also agree well with the data taken at a previous test [5] performed at the SPS with 300GeV beam energy and a slightly different detector design. However, scaling the result of 4.4mV up to 350GeV one would expect the signal at shower maximum around 5.1mV.…”
Section: A Absorber Scan At the Spssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This corresponds to an energy deposition of 4.7MeV in the gas layers. The table of shower particles from the previous test in [5] was also reproduced. As it can be seen in Table III the simulation predicts a slightly smaller value of the mean energy per particle per proton but the total energy for each particle type is well reproduced.…”
Section: A Absorber Scan At the Spsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most samples show a decrease of light output to 40% of the pre-irradiation value at the maximum absorbed dose of 30 kGy. There was no significant difference in the effects of irradiation measured by UV light or by the 12 C beam. Irradiation of the fiber light-guide showed a small decrease of light transmission for the wavelength of 490 nm because of the decrease in transparency due to irradiation.…”
Section: Results Of Radiation Damage Testsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The final integrated dose was 30 kGy with a beam intensity of 10 8 particles s −1 cm −2 . The degradation of scintillator light outputs were evaluated by measuring the signal for the weak 12 C beam itself and for UV light (350 nm) from a filtered Xe flash lamp (Hamamatsu L4633-01). Different irradiation rates (3×10 4 Gy/h, 8×10 4 Gy/h and increasing rate from 2×10 0 to 8×10 4 Gy/h) were compared.…”
Section: Results Of Radiation Damage Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier, a similar concept was suggested for the SSC [3]. The BRAN detectors are fast ionization chambers designed to monitor the relative luminosity at LHC at the interaction regions IR1 (ATLAS Experiment) and IR5 (CMS Experiment) by sampling the shower energy produced by forward neutrons and photons from p-p, p-Pb and Pb-Pb collisions [4][5][6][7][8][9]. This paper describes the design criteria and fabrication of the BRAN, and documents comparisons between simulated and actual BRAN performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%