2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial Specimen Diversion Device® reduces blood culture contamination and vancomycin use in academic medical centre

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…BCC events to a greater extent than has been previously observed. [20][21][22][23] Moreover, ours is the first study to address the impact of contamination on false-positive CLABSIs. Notably, phlebotomists performing traditional venipuncture without the ISDD likely had higher BCC rates than RNs because phlebotomists drew most blood samples from inpatients, including those in the intensive care units and those considered to be 'hard stick' patients, whereas RNs drew blood samples primarily from ED patients who overall are not as difficult to draw from.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…BCC events to a greater extent than has been previously observed. [20][21][22][23] Moreover, ours is the first study to address the impact of contamination on false-positive CLABSIs. Notably, phlebotomists performing traditional venipuncture without the ISDD likely had higher BCC rates than RNs because phlebotomists drew most blood samples from inpatients, including those in the intensive care units and those considered to be 'hard stick' patients, whereas RNs drew blood samples primarily from ED patients who overall are not as difficult to draw from.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A contaminated case of blood culture is associated with unnecessary treatment [ 25 ]. ASPs should target to reduce the DASC of contaminated cases including BSIs due to fungi, although this study could not discriminate against other existing infections [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the most challenging interpretation is determining if the organism recovered from the blood culture is an actual pathogen that causes bloodstream infection or a contaminant (false positive). If it is a contaminant, the patient can end up getting antibiotics when they are not necessary, which would put the patient at more risk (Nielsen et al, 2022). Since there is no specific treatment for sepsis, it is difficult to understand the primary etiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%