2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2013.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial postbuckling behavior of thin-walled frames under mode interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geometric nonlinearities have to be considered, as well, viz . by using the suggestions presented in , while a complete dynamic approach for the generalized beam theory has been addressed in and in the references cited therein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometric nonlinearities have to be considered, as well, viz . by using the suggestions presented in , while a complete dynamic approach for the generalized beam theory has been addressed in and in the references cited therein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the relevant effort of modeling out of plane deformation configurations and related buckling phenomena must be pursued, see the guidelines described, for example, in [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other issues of relevance in the structural context are related to damage and fracture characterization (see for some examples [57][58][59][60][61][62]) and fluid-structure interaction, which is particularly delicate for these kinds of light systems and with heterogeneous material properties (see for further details [63][64][65][66]). These aspects can involve instability of the structure, which being very complex require unconventional computational methods (see, e.g., [67][68][69][70]). It is worth investigating the use of the Generalized Beam Theory in order to model in a more accurate way the fibers, in particular taking cross section distortions into account (see, e.g., [71][72][73]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%