1956
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(56)90051-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial oxidation rate of metals and the logarithmic equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…-The dispersion of the results observed during the different analyses conducted in samples treated under the same condition. -It was found in general for both studies that the EDS O% results exhibited a logarithmic trend, as it is observed in general oxidation theory -in that oxide thickness development under temperature exposure shows a logarithmic trend with time [11,12]. …”
Section: Eds On Treated Test Samplessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…-The dispersion of the results observed during the different analyses conducted in samples treated under the same condition. -It was found in general for both studies that the EDS O% results exhibited a logarithmic trend, as it is observed in general oxidation theory -in that oxide thickness development under temperature exposure shows a logarithmic trend with time [11,12]. …”
Section: Eds On Treated Test Samplessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The evolutions of the k l and k p as a function of temperature are reported as an Arrhenius plot ( figure 5), together with the values of k. Hence, from the slope of the linear fit of the natural logarithm of k l [21] and of k p 2 (or k 2 ) [6] as function of 1/T, it is possible to calculate the value of the apparent activation energies for the oxidation. In the present case, using eq.…”
Section: Figure 5 -Arrhenius Plots Of Rate Constants According To Eqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Here, an oxide film is formed, and the carbon dioxide formation is controlled by either diffusion or migration of the reactants through this film. [24][25][26] This mechanism is unlikely due to carbon's anisotropic nature and low measured surface oxide coverage. 14,27 Furthermore, the reaction rate does not follow the logarithmic, inverse logarithmic, or parabolic rate law…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%