2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000je001366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial mapping and interpretation of lunar crustal magnetic anomalies using Lunar Prospector magnetometer data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
191
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
191
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatively weak fields (up to some tens of nT at spacecraft altitude) were mostly recorded antipodal to the largest lunar basins (Imbrium, Crisium, Serenitatis) (Anderson and Wilhelms 1979). This suggests that these magnetic anomalies are caused by the ejecta of impact processes, that were deposited at antipodal locations in the presence of an impact-amplified magnetic field (Hood et al 2001). …”
Section: The Moonmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relatively weak fields (up to some tens of nT at spacecraft altitude) were mostly recorded antipodal to the largest lunar basins (Imbrium, Crisium, Serenitatis) (Anderson and Wilhelms 1979). This suggests that these magnetic anomalies are caused by the ejecta of impact processes, that were deposited at antipodal locations in the presence of an impact-amplified magnetic field (Hood et al 2001). …”
Section: The Moonmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Paleointensity measurements on the returned samples suggest that the lunar surface field was comparable in intensity to the present-day terrestrial surface field about 3.6 to 3.8 Gy ago. Recent measurements by Lunar Prospector refined our understanding of the lunar magnetic field (Hood et al 2001). Relatively weak fields (up to some tens of nT at spacecraft altitude) were mostly recorded antipodal to the largest lunar basins (Imbrium, Crisium, Serenitatis) (Anderson and Wilhelms 1979).…”
Section: The Moonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study 28) suggested that the most probable sources of the ancient lunar magnetic fields were (1) a former core dynamo during a high-field epoch and (2) transient magnetic fields generated by the interaction of impact plasmas with the ambient field during brief periods of ejecta emplacement. Distribution of magnetic anomalies less than 1 nT were definitely confirmed in the Crisium-, the Serenitatis-, and the Imbrium-antipodes in the SPA basin and in the Lemonosov-Fleming, the Crisium, the Moscoviense, the Apollo basins, isolated anomalies such as the Reiner Gamma, and newly identified eleven isolated anomalies from the 100 km altitude orbit 29) .…”
Section: Origin Of the Lunar Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study has indicated that the most probable sources of the ancient lunar magnetic fields were (1) a former core dynamo during a high-field epoch and (2) transient magnetic fields generated by the interaction of impact plasmas with the ambient field during brief periods of ejecta emplacement 8) . The LMAG Kaguya mission aims at finding weak magnetic remnants less than 10 -5 T using an electron reflectometer.…”
Section: Origin Of Lunar Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%