1996
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(1996)122:1(7)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial-Inflow-Variation Impacts on Furrow Irrigation Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The times to steady state for the inflows in Figure 7 are substantially less than those presented by Renault and Wallender (1996) for the cases of gated pipe and over bank siphons. In these two cases the times were determined not by hydraulic factors but by the time taken to open the gates along the gated pipe or to prime the siphons for each of the furrows.…”
Section: Fig 7 About Herementioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The times to steady state for the inflows in Figure 7 are substantially less than those presented by Renault and Wallender (1996) for the cases of gated pipe and over bank siphons. In these two cases the times were determined not by hydraulic factors but by the time taken to open the gates along the gated pipe or to prime the siphons for each of the furrows.…”
Section: Fig 7 About Herementioning
confidence: 67%
“…Any change in the rate of inflow influences the trajectory of the irrigation advance and hence the irrigation performance for that furrow as indicated by the usual measures of application efficiency and uniformity (Renault and Wallender, 1996). Evaluation of the irrigation, using an inverse solution to predict the soil infiltration characteristic from the irrigation advance, is complicated by this inflow variation and error is introduced into those techniques that rely on an assumption of constant inflow (for example, Gillies et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that accounting for the temporal variation in inflow should in many cases reduce the apparent variability between estimated infiltration rates for furrows in the same field. Renault and Wallender (1996) concluded that this would result in larger values of the Kostiakov k and lower values of a when assuming constant inflow.…”
Section: Inflow As a Source Of Variability In Spatial Estimates Of Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renault and Wallender (1996) found that initial variations in inflow rates often cause the resulting Kostiakov infiltration functions to have low a but high k. Experience with the INFILT optimisation of McClymont and Smith (1996) suggests that a seemingly small change in the inflow rate can have a considerable impact on the estimated infiltration function. However, inflow variation is often overlooked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation