2020
DOI: 10.1037/rep0000308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial factor exploration of disability identity.

Abstract: This article provides initial factor analysis grounding for a new clinical and research tool to assess disability identity for adults with either visible/apparent or hidden/less apparent disabilities. The exploratory factor analysis identifies both internal and external dimensions of disability identity. Both internal and external dimensions are important and together represent disability identity. Rehabilitation practitioners are encouraged to consider disability identity while assessing and assisting clients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, developmentally, their conceptualization of acceptance varied significantly based on their physical location within or outside of the school building and who they were with (e.g., peers, nonpeers). In relation to the adult model of disability identity development (Forber-Pratt, Merrin, Mueller, et al, 2020), it is believed that, in addition to these concepts not being as well solidified yet for adolescents, there's an additional layer of grappling the adolescents face related to location or context that appears to be more salient for adolescents than for adults. This is not to say that location does not matter for adults, but rather that adolescents in particular-potentially with less independence or agency to go where they want to go-are dependent upon the spaces and contexts that already surround them or that are intentionally based heavily on influence from parents/guardians.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, developmentally, their conceptualization of acceptance varied significantly based on their physical location within or outside of the school building and who they were with (e.g., peers, nonpeers). In relation to the adult model of disability identity development (Forber-Pratt, Merrin, Mueller, et al, 2020), it is believed that, in addition to these concepts not being as well solidified yet for adolescents, there's an additional layer of grappling the adolescents face related to location or context that appears to be more salient for adolescents than for adults. This is not to say that location does not matter for adults, but rather that adolescents in particular-potentially with less independence or agency to go where they want to go-are dependent upon the spaces and contexts that already surround them or that are intentionally based heavily on influence from parents/guardians.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 1, we used the information from the adolescents to further update the Revised model of Social and Psychosocial Disability Identity Development (Forber-Pratt, Merrin, Mueller, et al, 2020) to create the Adolescent Disability Identity Conceptual Framework. This centers the adolescent disability identity experience and includes both internalization and externalization of that identity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a growing body of literature on disability identity development, research that understands its implications for people’s everyday lives is still needed (Forber-Pratt et al , 2020). Identity is complex, multi-dimensional and forever adapting to the environment, therefore understanding how, when and under what circumstances identity is positively and negatively impacted for people with a disability is critical (Valeras, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Purpose/Objective: This work provides comprehensive analyses targeting the factor structure and dimensionality of the Disability Identity Development Scale (DIDS). In Forber-Pratt et al, 2020, disability was defined broadly to include individuals with visible or hidden disabilities across many disability groups (i.e., physical, intellectual, learning, or chronic illness). Research Method/Design: Retained items from previous exploratory factor analysis were administered to a sample of adults with disabilities ( n = 1,126) ranging in age from 18–78 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there are examples of individuals resonating with certain phases in different orders. Therefore, thinking of these as statuses instead of stages allows for both progression and regression among statuses (Forber-Pratt & Zape, 2017; Forber-Pratt et al, 2020). It also accounts for the fact that an individual may be in more than one status simultaneously, and even may go through this process multiple times in their lifetime due to the presence of more than one disability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%