2016
DOI: 10.1525/collabra.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial Evidence that Individuals Form New Relationships with Partners that More Closely Match their Ideal Preferences

Abstract: An important assumption in interpersonal attraction research asking participants about their ideal partner preferences is that these preferences play a role in actual mate choice and relationship formation. Existing research investigating the possible predictive validity of ideal partner preference, however, is limited by the fact that none of it has focused on the actual process of relationship formation. The current research recruited participants when single, assessed ideal partner preferences across 38 tra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(31 reference statements)
5
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although scholars occasionally examine initial attraction longitudinally Bahns, Crandall, Gillath, & Preacher, 2017;Eastwick & Finkel, 2008b;Reis, Maniaci, Caprariello, Eastwick, & Finkel, 2011;Sharabi & Caughlin, 2017;Sprecher & Duck, 1994), such studies are rare. Even rarer are studies that attempt to capture the "official" formation of a relationship-defined as the moment two people agree they are romantic partners (Campbell, Chin, & Stanton, 2016;Eastwick & Finkel, 2008a;Eastwick, Keneski, Morgan, McDonald, & Huang, 2018). Consequently, we know remarkably little about what takes place between the moment two strangers meet and the moment they form a mutually recognized, committed romantic partnership (Campbell & Stanton, 2014;Eastwick & Finkel, 2008c).…”
Section: Limitation 1: the Gap Between Models Of Initial Attraction Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although scholars occasionally examine initial attraction longitudinally Bahns, Crandall, Gillath, & Preacher, 2017;Eastwick & Finkel, 2008b;Reis, Maniaci, Caprariello, Eastwick, & Finkel, 2011;Sharabi & Caughlin, 2017;Sprecher & Duck, 1994), such studies are rare. Even rarer are studies that attempt to capture the "official" formation of a relationship-defined as the moment two people agree they are romantic partners (Campbell, Chin, & Stanton, 2016;Eastwick & Finkel, 2008a;Eastwick, Keneski, Morgan, McDonald, & Huang, 2018). Consequently, we know remarkably little about what takes place between the moment two strangers meet and the moment they form a mutually recognized, committed romantic partnership (Campbell & Stanton, 2014;Eastwick & Finkel, 2008c).…”
Section: Limitation 1: the Gap Between Models Of Initial Attraction Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these claims have not been scientifically vetted, they are not theoretically far-fetched. Myriad perspectives in the close relationships and evolutionary psychological literatures suggest that outcomes such as relationship satisfaction and longevity follow from the conjunction of two partners' preferences, traits, and personal histories (e.g., Buss & Barnes, 1986;Byrne, 1961;McNulty, 2016;Campbell, Chin, & Stanton, 2016).…”
Section: Is Romantic Desire Predictable?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, recent studies indicate that ideal partner preferences are not just idle fantasies but have real‐world effects (Conroy‐Beam & Buss, ; Gerlach, Arslan, Schultze, Reinhard, & Penke, ). For example, Campbell, Chin, and Stanton () assessed the ideal partner preferences of singles (people not being in a casual or serious relationship) and tracked the singles for over a 5‐month period until some of them entered into relationships. The new partners were then contacted and asked to describe themselves regarding the same characteristics the previous singles had used to describe their ideal partners.…”
Section: Similarity Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%