1994
DOI: 10.1007/s004410050271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial enamel crystals are not spatially associated with mineralized dentine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors claim that the enamel crystals grow epitaxially on the preexisting dentin crystals because of a high continuity between enamel and dentin crystals (Arsenault and Robinson 1989;Hayashi 1993). Others have shown that enamel crystals are formed at a given distance from the dentin surface (Diekwisch et al 1998) and could either reach dentin crystals by a subsequent growth (Takano et al 1996) or remain distant (Dong and Warshawsky 1996). In the present study, we found only two types of crystallographic orientations between enamel and dentin crystals, and in both cases no direct contact between particle types was found (Figs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 33%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors claim that the enamel crystals grow epitaxially on the preexisting dentin crystals because of a high continuity between enamel and dentin crystals (Arsenault and Robinson 1989;Hayashi 1993). Others have shown that enamel crystals are formed at a given distance from the dentin surface (Diekwisch et al 1998) and could either reach dentin crystals by a subsequent growth (Takano et al 1996) or remain distant (Dong and Warshawsky 1996). In the present study, we found only two types of crystallographic orientations between enamel and dentin crystals, and in both cases no direct contact between particle types was found (Figs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 33%
“…Enamel crystals were described as growing either epitaxially on the preexisting dentin crystals because of a high continuity between enamel and dentin crystals (Arsenault and Robinson 1989;Hayashi 1993) or at a distance from the dentin surface (Diekwisch et al 1998) followed by subsequent growth to bring them into contact with dentin crystals (Takano et al 1996). The relationship between enamel and dentin should be thus investigated to highlight, during enamel formation, the guiding or modulating role of the previously mineralized dentin layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7(D)] closely re- sembled the apatite crystals observed in the early stage of enamel biomineralization. 31,32 The modulation of rP172 on apatite crystals grown on Bioglass confirmed our recent observation of the elongating effect of both recombinant and native porcine amelogenins on the calcium phosphate crystals formed in solution and gel. 24,25 These findings verified to a large extent the hypothesis on the function of amelogenin assemblies in preventing premature lateral crystalcrystal fusions while promoting the c-axial crystal growth of the crystals throughout the full thickness of the secretory matrix.…”
Section: Surface Transformation In Scs Rp172supporting
confidence: 69%
“…The long and thin crystals shown in Figure 7(B,D) and in particular those in Figure 7(D) with a highly ordered crystal arrangement are similar to the apatite crystals formed in the early stage of enamel biomineralization. 31,32 …”
Section: Temmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…whereas others described enamel crystal growth at a certain distance from dentine (Diekwiseh et al, 1995). These differences might reside in the topology of DEJ which, in ultrathin sections, could sbow dentine crystals inside enamel territory and in the low crystallinity of young developing crystals which could be obscured by thicker ones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%