Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1002/deo2.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial drainage‐related prognostic factors for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A single‐center retrospective study

Abstract: Objectives Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PCC) is a complex disorder involving the hepatic hilum. Multiple endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sessions are necessary for diagnosis and treatment with underlying cholangitis risk. Our aim is to clarify the initial‐drainage‐related prognostic factors of PCC. Methods This study was a single‐center retrospective study. A total of 104 consecutive patients diagnosed with PCC from January 2010 to February 2020 were enr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, several important variables affecting the prognosis of older adult patients, such as laboratory data, tumor markers [ 47 ], performance status [ 48 50 ], and pretreatment geriatric assessment were not available in the database. Although adjusting all the possible factors associated with the prognosis, such as biliary drainage [ 51 53 ], was challenging, important factors including age, sex, body mass index, tumor location, functional status, and pre-existing comorbidities, were included in propensity score matching. Additionally, based on other database investigations, the Barthel Index was substituted for performance status [ 21 , 24 , 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, several important variables affecting the prognosis of older adult patients, such as laboratory data, tumor markers [ 47 ], performance status [ 48 50 ], and pretreatment geriatric assessment were not available in the database. Although adjusting all the possible factors associated with the prognosis, such as biliary drainage [ 51 53 ], was challenging, important factors including age, sex, body mass index, tumor location, functional status, and pre-existing comorbidities, were included in propensity score matching. Additionally, based on other database investigations, the Barthel Index was substituted for performance status [ 21 , 24 , 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%