1981
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1981.0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial dissolution kinetics of ionic oxides

Abstract: It is shown th at factors previously recognized, but not regarded as critical, can dominate dissolution kinetics of ionic oxides. The use of the nearly perfect {100} MgO surfaces of smoke cubes to obtain very precise values of dissolution rates per unit surface area, in dilute HC1, HC1O 4 and HNO 3 , has shown th at rates extrapolated to zero dissolution are almost independent of pH in the range 2.0- 3.5. Dissolution rates were measured by monitoring solution pH … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This dependence is not observed during the initial kinetic regime of MgO dissolution [11,12]. Protonation of oxide sites (eqs.…”
Section: Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This dependence is not observed during the initial kinetic regime of MgO dissolution [11,12]. Protonation of oxide sites (eqs.…”
Section: Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A dramatic restructuring of the smooth, nearly perfect (100) MgO smoke faces occurs before any significant dissolution (i.e. < 1 monolayer) can be measured [11,12]. It seems clear that surface diffusion of cationic and anionic species across the surface must be a rapid process in comparison to dissolution during the initial stage of interaction with water or acid.…”
Section: O>(s) + H + (Aq) -+ Oh(s)mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall rate can be controlled by diffusion of liquid reactants/products or by the surface reaction, dependent on the reaction conditions (Vermilyea, 1969;Segall et al, 1978Segall et al, , 1988Jones et al, 1981;Fruhwirth et al, 1985;Blesa et al, 1994;Wogelius et al, 1995;Jordan et al, 1999). However, there are situations referred to by some authors when the use of different theoretical approaches resulted in determining various potential ratecontrolling steps for identical reaction conditions, with no clear basis for discrimination between these alternatives (Vermilyea, 1966;Diggle, 1973;Gorichev and Kyprianov, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…FeO, Fe 3 O 4 , CuO, CoO, Cr 2 O 3 or NiO) in which the electronic properties of the solid in particular, charge-carrier concentration and mobilities, and the extent of charge depletion layers at the surfaces, may be of prime importance in the dissolution rate, in the case of a predominantly ionic oxide such as MgO, the charge characteristics are not rate-determining; so the influence on the dissolution kinetics of atomic surface detail, overall surface morphology and bonding of both surface atoms and adsorbed species can then be studied (Segall et al, 1978;Jones et al, 1984). (b) MgO is one of the few oxides that allow investigation of dissolution rates and mechanisms at near-room temperature-this fact turned out to be crucial for studying the dissolution kinetics of MgO intensively using various modern (and complementary) experimental techniques, from continuous kinetic measurements using a pH-meter (Vermilyea, 1969;Segall et al, 1978Segall et al, , 1988Jones et al, 1981;Fruhwirth et al, 1985) to atomic force microscopy or elastic recoil detection analysis (Wogelius et al, 1995;Suárez and Compton, 1998;Jordan et al, 1999;Mejias et al, 1999;Simpson et al, 2003). (c) Periclase forms a rock salt structure and has a relatively simple electronic structure that can be modelled using ab initio calculations (Mejias et al, 1999;Al-Abadleh and Grassian, 2003;Simpson et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%