1996
DOI: 10.7152/bippa.v15i0.11543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial colonization, and subsistence adaptation processes in the late prehistory of the island of Okinawa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the density of the archeological remains varies, there are no noticeable changes in their compositions within the excavated sequence. Therefore, contrary to the previous predictions (13,14), the Paleolithic people of Okinawa probably had sustained their life on this small, resourcepoor island for about 25,000 y or more until Neolithic components first appeared at c. 10,000 cal BP. Alternatively, if the occupational record actually was truncated by short hiatuses, this would imply recurrent colonization by maritime people of similar subsistence strategies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the density of the archeological remains varies, there are no noticeable changes in their compositions within the excavated sequence. Therefore, contrary to the previous predictions (13,14), the Paleolithic people of Okinawa probably had sustained their life on this small, resourcepoor island for about 25,000 y or more until Neolithic components first appeared at c. 10,000 cal BP. Alternatively, if the occupational record actually was truncated by short hiatuses, this would imply recurrent colonization by maritime people of similar subsistence strategies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…and wild boars (Sus scrofa) (12). This situation led some researchers to hypothesize that Okinawa and the other islands of the Ryukyus were too small for sustained occupation by Paleolithic people (13,14). Indeed, clear evidence of human material culture in the Ryukyu Archipelago predating 10,000 cal BP has so far been scant, echoing the general "problem" with early modern human sites in southeastern Asia: the paucity of material evidence for innovative or modern behavior such as advanced lithic technology and personal ornaments (15)(16)(17)(18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hanihara, 1991) considered Minatogawa as broadly representative of, or having affinities with, populations ancestral to the Holocene Jomon. However, both genetic and paleolithic evidence suggests a contradictory continental northeastern source of the Jomon (Sagawa, 1995;Takamiya, 1996;Omoto and Saitou, 1997;Adachi et al, 2009;Hanihara and Ishida, 2009). Some have cautioned against a direct Minatogawa to Jomon relationship, particularly in Okinawa Island (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Takamiya, 1996), and we are still far from answering the question of the emergence and formation of the Jomon people in the Japanese archipelago. Extensive and intensive morphological reexaminations and more discussions on the pertinent human specimens such as MMS, UMS, Yamashitacho Cave I, and also Hamakita remains, as well as the establishment of the chronometric age of fossils especially from the Minatogawa Fissure and the Yamashita-cho Cave I sites, are essential to clarify the relationships between Late Pleistocene populations and the Jomon people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%