2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2004.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial coke deposition on hydrotreating catalysts. Part II. Structure elucidation of initial coke on hydrodematallation catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the first 6 days on stream after performance stabilization, between 90 and 95% of total final coke was deposited for feed A and between 80 and 85% for feed B. It is consistent with the literature ,, that claims that coke deposition initially increases rapidly before a pseudostable state is reached. For reforming catalysts, Querini et al and Absi-Halabi found that coke equivalent to 25% of the weight of the original catalyst is deposited within the first few hours of operation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…During the first 6 days on stream after performance stabilization, between 90 and 95% of total final coke was deposited for feed A and between 80 and 85% for feed B. It is consistent with the literature ,, that claims that coke deposition initially increases rapidly before a pseudostable state is reached. For reforming catalysts, Querini et al and Absi-Halabi found that coke equivalent to 25% of the weight of the original catalyst is deposited within the first few hours of operation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The spectra of dried and ground samples were measured using proton gated decoupled single pulse excitation at high MAS (SPE/MAS) [16] and cross polarization with polarization inversion at low or moderate MAS (CP/PI/ MAS) [17]. For more details see Hauser et al [18]. As moderate MAS, 4 kHz (7 mm rotor) was chosen to minimize overlapping between the main signals (aliphatic and aromatic carbon) and the spinning side bands (SSB).…”
Section: Pilot Plant Experiments and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, extensive studies have been made to clarify the deactivation mechanism of the catalyst for HDS of heavy oil (Christensen et al, 1994;Iijima et al, 1997;Gualda & Kasztelan, 1994;Furimsky & Massoth, 1999;Yamazaki et al, 1999;Fujii et al, 2000;Idei et al, 2002aIdei et al, ,b, 2003Ternan et al, 1979;Egiebor et al, 1989;Díez et al, 1990Díez et al, , 1992de Jong et al, 1991de Jong et al, , 1994Hadjiloizou et al, 1992;Zeuthen et al, 1994Zeuthen et al, , 1995Marafi & Stanislaus, 1997;Koide et al, 1999;Seki & Yoshimoto, 2001a,b,c,d;Kumata et al, 2001;Callejas et al, 2001;Higashi et al, 2002;Amemiya et al, 2003;Sahoo et al, 2004;Hauser et al, 2005;Eijsbouts & Inoue, 1994). Based on these studies, it has been suggested that catalyst deactivation is caused by (i) deposition of V and/or Ni sulfides originated from metalloporphyrin compounds in heavy oil (Christensen et al, 1994;Iijima et al, 1997;Gualda & Kasztelan, 1994;Furimsky & Massoth, 1999;Yamazaki et al, 1999;Fujii et al, 2000;Idei et al, 2002aIdei et al, ,b, 2003, (ii) deposition of carbonaceous compounds (Gualda & Kasztelan, 1994;Furimsky & Massoth, 1999;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%