2020
DOI: 10.18514/mmn.2020.3083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial coefficients and fourth Hankel determinant for certain analytic functions

Abstract: The present work is an attempt to give partial proofs of certain conjectures on the fifth coefficient of certain normalized analytic functions. Further, bounds on the sixth and seventh coefficients for the starlike functions related to a lune are also investigated. The non-sharp bound on third and fourth Hankel determinants are also obtained.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On differentiating h 2 with respect to p, we obtain ∂h 2 ∂p = 6p 5 (1 + q) 3 (−1 + 7q + 19q 2 + 9q 3 + q 4 + q 5 ) + 2048p(77 + 146q + 246q 2 + 140q 3 + 94q 4 + 6q 5 + 3q 6 ) − 128p 3 (929 + 1783q + 2636q 2 + 1666q 3 + 878q 4 − 4q 5 + 29q 6 + 3q 7 ), further which becomes 0 at p = 0 and p = p 0 , given by p 0 := 32(929 + 1783q + 2636q 2 + 1666q 3 + 878q 4 − 4q 5 + 29q 6 + 3q 7 ) 3(1 + q) 3 (−1 + 7q + 19q 2 + 9q 3 + q 4 + q 5 ) − Ã, where à = 64 √ 2A 0 3(−1 + 4q + 37q 2 + 86q 3 + 92q 4 + 50q 5 + 15q 6 + 4q 7 + q 8 ) and A 0 = (107909 + 414041q + 1008402q 2 + 1557100q 3 + 1804144q 4 + 1471838q 5 + 913014q 6 + 363176q 7 + 107408q 8 + 9900q 9 + 6570q 10 + 346q 11 + 41q 12 + 15q 13 ) (1/2) .…”
Section: ) a Computation Showsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On differentiating h 2 with respect to p, we obtain ∂h 2 ∂p = 6p 5 (1 + q) 3 (−1 + 7q + 19q 2 + 9q 3 + q 4 + q 5 ) + 2048p(77 + 146q + 246q 2 + 140q 3 + 94q 4 + 6q 5 + 3q 6 ) − 128p 3 (929 + 1783q + 2636q 2 + 1666q 3 + 878q 4 − 4q 5 + 29q 6 + 3q 7 ), further which becomes 0 at p = 0 and p = p 0 , given by p 0 := 32(929 + 1783q + 2636q 2 + 1666q 3 + 878q 4 − 4q 5 + 29q 6 + 3q 7 ) 3(1 + q) 3 (−1 + 7q + 19q 2 + 9q 3 + q 4 + q 5 ) − Ã, where à = 64 √ 2A 0 3(−1 + 4q + 37q 2 + 86q 3 + 92q 4 + 50q 5 + 15q 6 + 4q 7 + q 8 ) and A 0 = (107909 + 414041q + 1008402q 2 + 1557100q 3 + 1804144q 4 + 1471838q 5 + 913014q 6 + 363176q 7 + 107408q 8 + 9900q 9 + 6570q 10 + 346q 11 + 41q 12 + 15q 13 ) (1/2) .…”
Section: ) a Computation Showsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, another type of second order Hankel determinant is obtained by taking q = 2 and n = 3, mathematically written as H 2 (3) := a 3 a 5 − a 2 4 . The estimations of the sharp bounds for these H q(n) is obtained by many authors for various sub-classes of A (see [5,23,29]). Third order Hankel determinant, given by H 3 (1) = a 3 (a 2 a 4 − a 2 3 ) − a 4 (a 4 − a 2 a 3 ) + a 5 (a 3 − a 2 2 ), (1.1) is obtained when q = 3 and n = 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 . The estimations of the sharp bound for these H q (n) is obtained by many authors for various sub-classes of A ( [3,23,33]). If we set q = 3 and n = 1 we get the |H 3 (1)| , the third order Hankel deerminant, which is given by…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initiative of finding the fourth Hankel determinant for subclasses of analytic functions was taken by Arif et al [3] in 2018. After that, only a few reserachers worked in this direction including [32,4,13,33,10,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%