2014
DOI: 10.2478/tmj-2014-0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial coefficient bounds for a subclass of $m$-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions

Abstract: Let Σ denote the class of functions f (z) = z + ∞ ∑ n=2 anz n belonging to the normalized analytic function class A in the open unit disk U, which are bi-univalent in U, that is, both the function f and its inverse f −1 are univalent in U. The usual method for computation of the coefficients of the inverse function= z is too difficult to apply in the case of m-fold symmetric analytic functions in U. Here, in our present investigation, we aim at overcoming this difficulty by using a general formula to compute t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
74
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
7
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we will show that these bounds can be improved even further for the m-fold symmetric bi-close-to-convex functions. Moreover, the coefficient bounds presented in this paper for |a m+1 |, |a 2m+1 | and m > 1 also improve those corresponding coefficient bounds given by Srivastava et al [12]. A function is said to be bi-close-to-convex in a simply connected domain if both the function and its inverse map are close-to-convex there.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Here we will show that these bounds can be improved even further for the m-fold symmetric bi-close-to-convex functions. Moreover, the coefficient bounds presented in this paper for |a m+1 |, |a 2m+1 | and m > 1 also improve those corresponding coefficient bounds given by Srivastava et al [12]. A function is said to be bi-close-to-convex in a simply connected domain if both the function and its inverse map are close-to-convex there.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This is a subclass of m-fold symmetric bi-close-to-convex functions. For m ≥ 2 the bounds presented by our Theorem 1.1 for |a m+1 | and |a 2m+1 | are far better than those given in [12,Theorem 3].…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Various subclasses of the bi-univalent function class Σ were introduced and non-sharp estimates on the first two coefficients |a 2 | and |a 3 | in the Taylor-Maclaurin series expansion (1.1) were found in several recent investigations (see, for example, [1,2,4,5,6,7,8,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,29,30,31,32,33,34,35] and references therein). The aforecited all these papers on the subject were actually motivated by the pioneering work of Srivastava et al [28].…”
Section: Introduction and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%