Initial assessment of hospital treatment by patients with paranoid schizophrenia: A predictor of outcome

Bröker, M.; Röhricht, Frank; Priebe, Stefan

doi:10.1016/0165-1781(95)02718-c

Cited by 27 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…was used. These items have been found to be of predictive validity for treatment outcome in several studies (Bröker et al, 1995;Priebe and Gruyters 1994, 1995a, 1995b.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Small but statistically significant differences in patients' satisfaction with different treatment settings have been found in randomized controlled studies. In inpatient and outpatient samples, the variation in patients' assessment of treatment has been shown to be of value in the prediction of outcome; patients with a more positive assessment of treatment tend to have a more favorable outcome (Bröker et al, 1995;Priebe and Gruyters, 1994, 1995a, 1995b.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Do Different Subjective Evaluation Criteria Reflect Distinct Constructs?

Priebe¹,

Kaiser²,

Huxley

et al. 1998

The Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Four subjective evaluation criteria-self-rated symptoms, subjective quality of life, self-rated needs, and patients' assessment of treatment-were examined to determine whether they reflect distinct constructs and to what extent they are correlated. The four criteria were assessed in 90 newly admitted schizophrenia patients, 170 long-term-hospitalized schizophrenia patients, 154 patients with alcoholism admitted for the short term, and 68 patients with alcoholism in longterm rehabilitation, using identical instruments. The four criteria show substantial intercorrelations, except for assessment of treatment in the two acute treatment groups. One general factor explains between 43% and 55% of the variance in each group. Factor scores are associated with observer-rated psychopathology and objective data. The four criteria overlap in different patient groups, except in the assessment of treatment in acute groups. The use of more than one subjective criterion should occur only with specific hypotheses. A better theoretical

show abstract

“…was used. These items have been found to be of predictive validity for treatment outcome in several studies (Bröker et al, 1995;Priebe and Gruyters 1994, 1995a, 1995b.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Different Subjective Evaluation Criteria Reflect Distinct Constructs?

Priebe¹,

Kaiser²,

Huxley

et al. 1998

The Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The positive impact of patients' initial assessment of their treatment on outcomes has been shown in various forms of psychiatric treatment, such as pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, day hospital, and involuntary inpatient treatment (Van Putten et al, 1981;Priebe and Gruyters, 1994;Broker et al, 1995;Priebe et al, 2009). This study shows that a positive change in voluntary patients' treatment satisfaction over time can lead to improvement in other outcomes, such as perceived coercion.…”

Section: Findings In the Context Of Previous Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

Why do some voluntary patients feel coerced into hospitalisation? A mixed-methods study

Katsakou

Marougka

Garabette

et al. 2011

Psychiatry Research

Self Cite

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to investigate factors linked to perceived coercion at admission and during treatment among voluntary inpatients. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used. Two hundred seventy patients were screened for perceived coercion at admission. Those who felt coerced into admission rated their perceived coercion during treatment a month after admission. Patient characteristics and experiences were tested as predictors of coercion. In-depth interviews on experiences leading to perceived coercion were conducted with 36 participants and analysed thematically. Thirty-four percent of patients felt coerced into admission and half of those still felt coerced a month later. No patient characteristics were associated with perceived coercion. Those whose satisfaction with treatment increased more markedly between baseline and a month later were less likely to feel coerced a month after admission. In the qualitative interviews three themes leading to perceived coercion were identified: viewing the hospital as ineffective and other treatments as more appropriate, not participating in the admission and treatment and not feeling respected. Involving patients in the decision-making and treating them with respect may reduce perceived coercion.

show abstract

“…The quality of the TR has been found to predict treatment adherence and outcome across a range of patient diagnoses and treatment settings (Oliver-Martin, 1986 ;Frank & Gunderson, 1990 ;Priebe & Gruyters, 1993 ;Bro¨ker et al 1995 ;Gaston et al 1998 ;Martin et al 2000;McCabe & Priebe, 2004) and may even be considered a curative agent in its own right (Catty, 2004). In community psychiatry, community mental health teams provide comprehensive care programmes for people with severe mental illness.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A new scale to assess the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care: STAR

et al. 2006

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. No instrument has been developed specifically for assessing the clinician-patient therapeutic relationship (TR) in community psychiatry. This study aimed to develop a measure of the TR with clinician and patient versions using psychometric principles for test construction.Method. A four-stage prospective study was undertaken, comprising qualitative semi-structured interviews about TRs with clinicians and patients and their assessment of nine established scales for their applicability to community care, administering an amalgamated scale of more than 100 items, followed by Principal Components Analysis (PCA) of these ratings for preliminary scale construction, test-retest reliability of the scale and administering the scale in a new sample to confirm its factorial structure. The sample consisted of patients with severe mental illness and a designated key worker in the care of 17 community mental health teams in England and Sweden.

show abstract

Initial assessment of hospital treatment by patients with paranoid schizophrenia: A predictor of outcome

Cited by 27 publications

References 23 publications

Do Different Subjective Evaluation Criteria Reflect Distinct Constructs?

Do Different Subjective Evaluation Criteria Reflect Distinct Constructs?

Why do some voluntary patients feel coerced into hospitalisation? A mixed-methods study

A new scale to assess the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care: STAR

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About