2006
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/8/12/327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhomogeneous superconductivity in comb-shaped Josephson junction networks

Abstract: We show that some of the Josephson couplings of junctions arranged to form an inhomogeneous network undergo a non-perturbative renormalization provided that the network's connectivity is pertinently chosen. As a result, the zero-voltage Josephson critical currents Ic turn out to be enhanced along directions selected by the network's topology. This renormalization effect is possible only on graphs whose adjacency matrix admits an hidden spectrum (i.e. a set of localized states disappearing in the thermodynamic … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, spatial inhomogeneities may be random, due to the presence of disorder or noise, as well as non-random, as a result of an external control on the geometry of the system: in a broad sense, their formation can be dynamically generated or induced through a suitable engineering of the system. As a consequence the effects of spatial inhomogeneities have been investigated in a variety of systems, ranging from pattern formation in systems with competing interactions [1] to Josephson networks with non-random, yet non-translationally invariant architecture [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, spatial inhomogeneities may be random, due to the presence of disorder or noise, as well as non-random, as a result of an external control on the geometry of the system: in a broad sense, their formation can be dynamically generated or induced through a suitable engineering of the system. As a consequence the effects of spatial inhomogeneities have been investigated in a variety of systems, ranging from pattern formation in systems with competing interactions [1] to Josephson networks with non-random, yet non-translationally invariant architecture [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we review how the pertinent choice of the network's connectivity leads to the emergence of new phenomena in quantum devices realized with superconducting JNNs [22] and cold atoms in optical lattices [30,32]. Our subsequent analysis well evidences that new emerging phenomena are possible only if the network's connectivity is described by an adjacency matrix supporting an hidden spectrum.…”
Section: Complex Behaviors Emerging From the Network's Connec-tivitymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…An hidden spectrum of the adjacency matrix emerges, for instance, when one analyzes bundled graphs [29] (i.e., those obtained by grafting a fiber graph to every point of a base graph) while, for graphs with constant coordination number (such as the Sierpinski gasket and the ladder graph), the adjacency matrix does not support any hidden spectrum [31]. In the following, we shall analyze the simple paradigmatic case of comb networks showing how the hidden spectrum of the adjacency matrix leads to unusual quantum behaviors such as the emergence of the spatial BEC on the comb's backbone for a Bose gas living on a combshaped optical lattice [30,32] and of the enhanced responses observed for classical combshaped JJNs made of Niobium grains [21,22][see Fig.1]. To better clarify our arguments, we find instructive to compare our results with those obtainable if the same devices were defined on a chain, since the latter is, after all, the simplest graph of euclidean dimension 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies suggest the possibility that the network topology may act as a catalyst for Bose-Einstein condensation allowing condensation even if d ≤ 2. The presence of BEC has been, in fact, proven, for simple d ≤ 2 non-translationally invariant networks as comb, star and wheel lattices [8][9][10][11][12][13], as well as in complex networks as the Apollonian one [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%