2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhomogeneous Magnetization Transfer (ihMT) imaging in the acute cuprizone mouse model of demyelination/remyelination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the four‐pool model—recently documented quite comprehensively by Manning et al 62 —considers two exchanging myelin and nonmyelin water pools, respectively exchanging with the myelin and nonmyelin macromolecular matrices. In addition, evidence was found that multiple dipolar order reservoirs exist in myelinated tissues 25 and in synthetized lipid samples representative of myelin, 63 and their intrinsic association to macromolecular Zeeman reservoirs (with respective and distinct MT parameters) has yet to be investigated. Of note, the proposed DOFS‐MTw acquisitions effectively remove the need to consider the dipolar order magnetization reservoirs, and the qMT‐ONRS model remains valid as long as the respective exchange rate and macromolecular T 2,b parameters are considered equal, contrary to the fitting of SOFS‐based acquisitions for which the impact of dipolar order reservoir on the saturation attenuation is less predictable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the four‐pool model—recently documented quite comprehensively by Manning et al 62 —considers two exchanging myelin and nonmyelin water pools, respectively exchanging with the myelin and nonmyelin macromolecular matrices. In addition, evidence was found that multiple dipolar order reservoirs exist in myelinated tissues 25 and in synthetized lipid samples representative of myelin, 63 and their intrinsic association to macromolecular Zeeman reservoirs (with respective and distinct MT parameters) has yet to be investigated. Of note, the proposed DOFS‐MTw acquisitions effectively remove the need to consider the dipolar order magnetization reservoirs, and the qMT‐ONRS model remains valid as long as the respective exchange rate and macromolecular T 2,b parameters are considered equal, contrary to the fitting of SOFS‐based acquisitions for which the impact of dipolar order reservoir on the saturation attenuation is less predictable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these early experiments were performed either on agar gel phantoms, which are not representative of the brain tissue and have weak dipolar order effects, 18 or on ex vivo white matter samples at room temperature, 17 which strongly limits the influence of dipolar order on the macromolecular magnetization 19–21 . Recent investigations have shown that myelinated central nervous system tissues are associated with relatively strong dipolar order effects as denoted by a long dipolar order relaxation time (T 1D ; T 1D ≈ 6–10 ms) and as identified by inhomogeneous magnetization transfer (ihMT) imaging in studies with ex vivo (at physiological temperature) and in vivo specimens from animals, such as in mouse brains 22–24 and rat spinal cord, 25 and in humans brains 26–28 . Hence, and given the typical irradiation powers used in clinical MR scanners for pulsed SOFS qMT experiments, the conditions for dipolar order to contribute to the MT signal in in vivo central nervous system tissues can be satisfied 29 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts are ongoing to explore new sequences to add to our protocol in order to expand the utility of our repository. Currently, inhomogeneous magnetization transfer, which has shown excellent sensitivity for myelin content validated in mice [105,106], is being considered as its applications move from animal models towards human imaging. New adaptations are also being tested to improve scan quality, including custom MR-compatible containers for standardization of brain orientation and to facilitate the use of gentle vacuuming to ensure bubble removal.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%