2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.66.014521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhomogeneous magnetism induced in a superconductor at a superconductor-ferromagnet interface

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
67
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, recent theoretical studies have focused on the inverse proximity effect, i.e. the induction of a magnetic moment in a superconductor in contact with a ferromagnet [8,9,10,11]. This phenomenon has been analyzed in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, recent theoretical studies have focused on the inverse proximity effect, i.e. the induction of a magnetic moment in a superconductor in contact with a ferromagnet [8,9,10,11]. This phenomenon has been analyzed in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e.g., [3]). It has been shown theoretically [4][5][6] that at S/F interface under the influence of exchange field a change in the density of states take place due to the differences for electrons with spin up and spin down. Later it was shown that the sign and magnitude of magnetic moment arising in the superconductor were highly dependent on the parameters of S/F interface such as transparency, presence of impurities and the thicknesses of layers [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is that the observed ferromagnetism induced in the S-layer has the same sign as that in the F-layer, which is in line with the prediction of ref. [3]. Considering the fact that we have a fully spin polarized ferromagnet CFS as the F-layer, the leakage or tunneling of same sign ferromagnetism into S-layer 3 is more likely rather than the opposite sign induced ferromagnetism 4,5 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two macroscopic quantum states in S and F layers influence each other via the penetration of superconducting (proximity effect) 2 and ferromagnetic (inverse proximity effect) [3][4][5] order through their common interface. In presence of strong enough magnetic fields, the vortices in the S-layer can couple with the magnetic domains of the F-layer leading to interesting effects of domain wall pinning of the vortices and vice-a-versa, and domain wall superconductivity [6][7][8][9][10] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation