Inhibitory Tagging on Randomly Moving Objects

Ogawa, Hirokazu; Takeda, Yuji; Yagi, Akihiro

doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00423

Cited by 36 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 19 publications

(31 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The converse is equally true (e.g., Klein and MacInnes, 1999;Ogawa, Takeda & Yagi, 2002). These practices suggests that many researchers implicitly endorse the notion that traditional and non-traditional observations of IOR are observations of the same phenomenon.…”

Section: Inhibition Of Returnmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inhibition of return: A phenomenon in search of a definition and a theoretical framework

Dukewich

Klein

2015

Atten Percept Psychophys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a study of scientific nomenclature, we explore the diversity of perspectives researchers endorse for the phenomenon of inhibition of return (IOR). IOR is often described as an effect whereby people are slower to respond to a target presented at a recently stimulated or inspected location as compared to a target presented at a new location. Since its discovery, scores of papers have been published on IOR, and researchers have proposed, accepted and rejected a variety of potential causes, mechanisms, effects and components for the phenomenon. Experts in IOR were surveyed about their opinions regarding various aspects of IOR and the literature exploring it. We found variety both between and within experts surveyed, suggesting that most researchers hold implicit, and often quite unique assumptions about IOR. These widely varied assumptions may be hindering the creation or acceptance of a central theoretical framework regarding IOR; and this variety may portend that what has been given the label "IOR" may be more than one phenomenon requiring more than one theoretical explanation. We wonder whether scientific progress in domains other than IOR might be affected by too broad (or perhaps too narrow) a range of phenomena to which our nomenclature is applied. Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article

show abstract

Section: Inhibition Of Returnmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inhibition of return: A phenomenon in search of a definition and a theoretical framework

Dukewich

Klein

2015

Atten Percept Psychophys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous studies in which the probing paradigm have been used have indicated that the memory capacity in visual search is over 8 items (Ogawa et al, 2002;Takeda & Yagi, 2000). They argued that memory capacity in visual search is more than FINST (Pylyshyn & Storm, 1988) and more than visual short-term memory in change detection tasks (e.g., Luck & Vogel, 1997).…”

Section: Model Fittingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These are by (1) using reaction times (RTs) for the detecting of probes among distractors (Klein, 1988;Müller & von Mühlenen, 2000;Ogawa, Takeda, & Yagi, 2002;Takeda & Yagi, 2000), (2) using the refixation frequency of eye movements (Gilchrist & Harvey, 2000;Peterson, Kramer, Wang, Irwin, & McCarley, 2001), and (3) using the slope of the search function in a dynamic display (Horowitz & Wolfe, 1998;Kristjánsson, 2000). Studies in which the first method has been used have consistently shown increased RTs for the detecting of probes at the locations of previously attended distractors, suggesting that these distractors are inhibited.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Search for multiple targets: Evidence for memory-based control of attention

Takeda

2004

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are two opposing models with regard to the function of memory in visual search: a memorydriven model and a memory-free model. Recently, Horowitz and Wolfe (2001) investigated a multipletarget search task. Participants were required to decide whether or not there were at least n targets present. They demonstrated that the reaction time 3 n function has a positive and accelerated curve. They argued that the memory-free model predicts this curve, whereas the memory-driven model predicts a linear function. In this study, I varied the total set sizes of a multiple-target search task and fitted the models separately for each n condition. The model fit indicated that the memory-driven model is more appropriate than the memory-free model in each n condition. These results suggest that an amnesic process does not cause the positive accelerated curve of the reaction time 3 n function but that it is the result of the time needed to examine each additional n item.

show abstract

“…Finally, when the display was removed at the time the probe was presented, IOR did not occur (Klein & McInnes, 1999;Müller & von Mühlenen, 2000;Takeda & Yagi, 2000), suggesting that the maintenance of IOR relies on the presence of the objects in the display. The assumption that IOR is object-rather than location-based was also supported by evidence that IOR operated during search even when the stimuli in the search display were moving (e.g., Ogawa, Takeda, & Yagi, 2002).…”

mentioning

confidence: 95%

Inhibition of return functions within but not across searches

Höfler

Gilchrist

Körner

2011

Atten Percept Psychophys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inhibition of return (IOR) facilitates visual search by discouraging the reinspection of recently processed items. We investigated whether IOR operates across two consecutive searches of the same display for different targets. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that IOR is present within each of the two searches. In Experiment 2, we found no evidence for IOR across searches. In Experiment 3, we showed that IOR is present across the two searches when the first search is interrupted, suggesting that the completion of the search is what causes the resetting of IOR. We concluded that IOR is a partially flexible process that can be reset when the task completes, but not necessarily when it changes. When resetting occurs, this flexibility ensures that the inhibition of previously visited locations does not interfere with the new search.

show abstract

Inhibitory Tagging on Randomly Moving Objects

Cited by 36 publications

References 19 publications

Inhibition of return: A phenomenon in search of a definition and a theoretical framework

Inhibition of return: A phenomenon in search of a definition and a theoretical framework

Search for multiple targets: Evidence for memory-based control of attention

Inhibition of return functions within but not across searches

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About