1954
DOI: 10.2307/1931041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibitory Effects of Phytoplankton upon the Feeding of Daphnia Magna with Reference to Growth, Reproduction, and Survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
1
2

Year Published

1961
1961
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
65
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we see no reason to assume that: the inhibitory substance chlorellin should not be effective in young cultures; the fact that Ryther (1954) did not note inhibition in Daphnia cultures fed log-phase algae is not understandable in the light of the earlier work. feeding habit was observed-a change from filter-feeding to grazing, or foraging.…”
Section: Numbers and Form Of Fecal Ejectamentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, we see no reason to assume that: the inhibitory substance chlorellin should not be effective in young cultures; the fact that Ryther (1954) did not note inhibition in Daphnia cultures fed log-phase algae is not understandable in the light of the earlier work. feeding habit was observed-a change from filter-feeding to grazing, or foraging.…”
Section: Numbers and Form Of Fecal Ejectamentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Ryther { 1954) found that Daphnia magna fed senescent cultures of Chlorellu showed much greater inhibition in growth and reproduction than did those fed algae that were in the log-phase of growth. We used only young cultures of algae.…”
Section: Numbers and Form Of Fecal Ejectamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Both the dependent variables and animal size were transformed to their decimal logarithms because such transformations usually linearize interspecific body size relations (Brody 1945;Bonner 1965;Peters 1983 Ambler and Frost 1974;Anraku and Omori 1963;Baudouin and Ravera 1972;Bogdan and McNaught 1975;Comita 1968;Comita and Schindler 1963;Conover 1959;Durbin and Durbin 1978;Harvey 1937;Hebert 1978;Heinle 1966;Kryutchkowa and Rybak 197 1;Lemcke and Lampert 1975;McMahon and Rigler 1965;Marshall and Orr 1955;Moshiri et al 1969;Nival et al 1974;Omori 1970;Rakusa-Suszczewski et al 1976;Ryther 1954;Sameoto 1976;Sushchenya 1958;Taguchi and Ishi 1972. ) feeding rates may not be monotonic functions of temperature (Kersting and Van der Leeuw 1976;Zankai and Ponyi 1976), food concentration (Richman 1966;Rigler 197 1;Frost 1975;Mullin et al 1975;Muck and Lampert 1980;Downing 198 1;Porter et al 1982), or food particle volume (Allan et al 1977;McQueen 1970;Nival and Nival 1976).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) and zooplankton grazing decreased (Table 3). It has been observed in laboratory experiments that zooplankton grazing rate decreases with slower growing phytoplankton (Ryther 1954, Mullin 1963, possibly d u e to reduced chemical cues or negative feedback (Poulet & Oulett 1982, Cowles et al 1986). …”
Section: Phytoplankton Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%