2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2006.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibitory effects of an orexin-2 receptor antagonist on orexin A- and stress-induced ACTH responses in conscious rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the hyperarousal response, OX1R blockade did not affect the cage-exchange stressinduced ACTH release in mice, suggesting that OX1Rs are not directly involved in HPA axis activation elicited by this Orexin-1 Receptor Antagonist Attenuates Stress-Induced Hyperarousal psychological stress model. A putative OX2R-mediated effect might be rather expected since increase in ACTH levels by swimming stress was attenuated with prior central infusion of an OX2R antagonist (Chang et al, 2007), a result consistent with the predominance of OX2R in the PVN (Marcus et al, 2001). However, in a later study, administration of the dual OX1/2R antagonist almorexant in rats failed to alter the release of corticosterone in basal and various stress conditions (novelty, social stress, and restraint stress) or the release of ACTH upon pharmacological challenge with corticotrophinreleasing factor (Steiner et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the hyperarousal response, OX1R blockade did not affect the cage-exchange stressinduced ACTH release in mice, suggesting that OX1Rs are not directly involved in HPA axis activation elicited by this Orexin-1 Receptor Antagonist Attenuates Stress-Induced Hyperarousal psychological stress model. A putative OX2R-mediated effect might be rather expected since increase in ACTH levels by swimming stress was attenuated with prior central infusion of an OX2R antagonist (Chang et al, 2007), a result consistent with the predominance of OX2R in the PVN (Marcus et al, 2001). However, in a later study, administration of the dual OX1/2R antagonist almorexant in rats failed to alter the release of corticosterone in basal and various stress conditions (novelty, social stress, and restraint stress) or the release of ACTH upon pharmacological challenge with corticotrophinreleasing factor (Steiner et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional consideration of an orexin-PVT emotional arousal system It is well documented that orexins can produce a stress-like response by enhancing the activity of the hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal axis and the secretion of stress hormones in the circulation (Chang et al 2007;Ida et al 2000;Jaszberenyi et al 2000;Kuru 2000;Sakamoto et al 2004;Samson et al 2002Samson et al , 2007. In turn, orexin neurons may be activated by novelty-stress, pain, and contextual cues associated with shock (Espana et al 2003;Furlong et al 2009;Watanabe et al 2005;Winsky-Sommerer et al 2004;Zhu et al 2002), but not other stressors like exposure to cold and restraint (Furlong et al 2009;Kiss 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antagonist SB334867 has a 50-fold selectivity for OX1R compared to OX2R whereas TCSOX229 has a 250-fold selectivity for the OX2R over the OX1R (Duxon et al 2001;Hirose et al 2003). Similar doses of orexin antagonists were effective at blocking some of the behavioral effects of orexins (Chang et al 2007;Hollander et al 2008). …”
Section: Ethological Behavior Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, systemic injections of SB 334867, at doses that significantly decreased high-fat food self-administration, had no effect on reinstatement induced by pellet-priming, yohimbine or hypocretin 1. These data potentially suggest that the role of hypocretin 1 in relapse to food seeking is mediated by Hcrt 2 receptors, an issue that can be explored pending the availability of selective Hcrt 2 receptor antagonists (Chang et al, 2007) or mixed Hcrt 1/ Hcrt 2 receptor antagonists (Brisbare-Roch et al, 2007). One possible explanation for the lack of effect of SB 334867 on reinstatement of food seeking is due to lower baseline response rates during tests for reinstatement versus selfadministration.…”
Section: Role Of Hcrt 1 Receptors In Food Self-administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%