Inhibitory control performance is repeatable across years and contexts in a wild bird population

Abstract

Inhibitory control is one of several cognitive mechanisms required for self-regulation, decision making and attention towards tasks. Linked to a variety of maladaptive behaviours in humans, inhibitory control is expected to influence behavioural plasticity in animals in the context of foraging, social interaction, or responses to sudden changes in the environment. One widely used cognitive assay, the detour task, putatively tests inhibitory control. In this task, subjects must avoid impulsively touching transparent barriers positioned in front of food, and instead access the food by an alternative but known route. Recently it has been suggested that the detour task is unreliable and measures factors unrelated to inhibitory control, including motivation, previous experience and persistence. Consequently, there is growing uncertainty as to whether this task leads to erroneous interpretations about animal cognition and its links with socio-ecological traits. To address these outstanding concerns, we designed a variant of the detour task for wild great tits (Parus major) and deployed it at the nesting site of the same individuals across two spring seasons. This approach eliminated the use of food rewards, limited social confounds, and maximised motivation. We compared task performance in the wild with their performance in captivity when tested using the classical cylinder detour task during the non-breeding season. Task performance was temporally and contextually repeatable, and none of the confounds had any significant effect on performance, nor did they drive any of the observed repeatable differences among individuals. These results support the hypothesis that our assays captured intrinsic differences in inhibitory control. Instead of throwing the detour task out with the bathwater, we suggest confounds are likely system and experimental-design specific, and that assays for this potentially fundamental but largely overlooked source of behavioural plasticity in animal populations, should be validated and refined for each study system.

Long-term repeatability of cognitive performance

“…The vast majority of studies that have quantified the repeatability of cognitive performance have done so across relatively short timeframes (see Cauchoix et al . [ 19 ] and references therein), typically in the range of days to weeks between tasks (although see Soha et al [ 20 ], Davidson et al [ 21 ], and Cole et al [ 22 ] for notable exceptions). A recent meta-analysis of cognitive task performance measures across many species found moderate support for both temporal (same task presented at different times) and contextual (different tasks that are designed to quantify the same cognitive trait) short-term repeatability of cognitive performance [ 19 ], suggesting the use of psychometric tasks is a valid tool for the study of cognition.…”