1988
DOI: 10.1210/endo-122-5-1715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibitors of Mammalian Tissue Collagenase and Metalloproteinases Suppress Ovulation in the Perfused Rat Ovary*

Abstract: We have examined the effects of a new synthetic inhibitor of mammalian tissue collagenase, CI-1 (N-[3-N-(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino-1-(R)carboxypropyl]L-leucyl-O-methyl-L- tyrosine N-methylamide; G. D. Searle SC 40827), and a general metalloproteinase inhibitor, 1,10-phenanthroline, on ovulation, as judged by the observation of follicular rupture, and on progesterone production of the perfused rat ovary. Ovaries of PMSG (20 IU)-primed rats were perfused for 21 h, and samples of medium were taken for analysis of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although inhibition of ovarian MMPs can reduce or inhibit ovulation, this appears to be dependent on species and methodology. Synthetic inhibitors of collagenase significantly reduced ovulation in PMSG or eCG-primed perfused rat ovaries (Brännström et al, 1988;Butler et al, 1991), and ovulation was blocked with administration of an anti-MMP-2 antibody in PGF (2alpha) and GnRH primed sheep (Gottsch et al, 2002). Despite these correlations, other studies do not clearly identify a role for MMPs during ovulation or corpus luteum function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although inhibition of ovarian MMPs can reduce or inhibit ovulation, this appears to be dependent on species and methodology. Synthetic inhibitors of collagenase significantly reduced ovulation in PMSG or eCG-primed perfused rat ovaries (Brännström et al, 1988;Butler et al, 1991), and ovulation was blocked with administration of an anti-MMP-2 antibody in PGF (2alpha) and GnRH primed sheep (Gottsch et al, 2002). Despite these correlations, other studies do not clearly identify a role for MMPs during ovulation or corpus luteum function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In cell culture, Kruk et al (10) have demonstrated the capacity of human ovarian surface epithelial (HOSE) cells to secrete serine proteases and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), as well as to lyse Matrigel, although how these activities are regulated has not been explored. Several lines of evidence have implicated that both the MMP and plasminogen activator system contribute to the proteolytic activity needed at the time of ovarian rupture during ovulation (11,12), e.g., an increase in plasminogen activator and MMP activities has been detected during the preovulatory period (18 -20), and synthetic MMP inhibitors suppressed ovulation in perfused rat ovaries (21,22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ovulatory process involves the remodeling of extracellular matrix which is executed by MMPs and plasminogen activators. Several studies have demonstrated that adminstration of inhibitors of MMPs and antibodies to plasminogen activator suppresses ovulation in rats (Reich et al 1985, Brannstrom et al 1988, Tsafriri et al 1989, Butler et al 1991. Also, the activities of plasminogen activator and MMPs, including interstitial collagenase, type IV collagenase, gelatinase and proteoglycanase, increases during the periovulatory period (Palotie et al 1987, Curry et al 1992.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally believed that remodeling of extracellular matrix involves at least two important enzyme systems, the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) system and the serine proteinase plasminogen activator system (Seller & Murphy 1981, Harris et al 1984, Saksela 1985, Matrisian 1990). These proteinases have been shown to play important roles in the ovulatory process (Reich et al 1985, Palotie et al 1987, Brannstrom et al 1988, Tsafriri et al 1989, Butler et al 1991, Curry et al 1992.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%