Inhibition with part-list cuing: Some tests of the item strength hypothesis.

Basden, David R.; Basden, Barbara H.; Galloway, Betsey C.

doi:10.1037/0278-7393.3.1.100

Cited by 82 publications

(127 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

112

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In both part-set cuing and reading experiments, older adults are the most impaired when they have to ignore semantically related information. This may occur because semantically related cues are more disruptive to participants' natural retrieval strategies (e.g., Basden & Basden, 1995;Basden, Basden, & Galloway, 1977) or because interference from the test cues is greater when they are related to the remaining to-be-remembered material (see Anderson & Neely, 1996, for a review of interference theory).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Part-Set Cuing Effects in Younger and Older Adults.

Marsh¹,

Dolan²,

Balota³

et al. 2004

Psychology and Aging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 3 experiments, the authors examined part-set cuing effects in younger and older adults. Participants heard lists of category exemplars and later recalled them. Recall was uncued or cued with a subset of studied items. In Experiment 1, participants were cued with some of the category names, and they remembered fewer never-cued categories than a free-recall condition. In Experiment 2, a similar effect was observed for category exemplar cues. There was also an age difference: By some measures, a small number of cues impaired older adults more than younger. Experiment 3 replicated this result and found that older adults were disproportionately slow in the presence of cues. Across experiments, older adults showed robust part-set cuing effects, and sometimes, they were disproportionately impaired by cues.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Part-Set Cuing Effects in Younger and Older Adults.

Marsh¹,

Dolan²,

Balota³

et al. 2004

Psychology and Aging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This explanation has received support from studies that varied the compatibility between the way cues were presented and the "natural" retrieval strategy triggered by the task. Moreover, some studies have shown that the removal of cues can produce a release from part-set cuing (e.g., D. R. Basden & B. H. Basden, 1995;D. R. Basden, B. H. Basden, & Galloway, 1977).…”

Section: Part-set Cuing In Option Generationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Part-set cuing in option generation

Missier

Terpini

2009

Memory & Cognition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Inasmuch as the cues in this case were not contained on the study list, items recalled from the list would not have to be checked against them before being reported. Basden, Basden, and Galloway (1977) have suggested that the editing of cues from recall may influence the order in which items are recalled, and the resulting recall order may be suboptimal relative to whatever organization the subject imposed on the items while studying them. Basden et al considered this hypothesis to be consistent with all the results that had been obtained up to the time of their report.…”

Section: The Editing Task Hypothesismentioning

confidence: 99%