1996
DOI: 10.1177/095632029600700203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of Varicella-Zoster Virus by Penciclovir in Cell Culture and Mechanism of Action

Abstract: SummaryThe effect of penciclovir (BRL 39123) on the replication of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) in human embryonic lung fibroblasts (MRC-5 cells) was similar to aciclovir when the compounds were present continuously. However, when the compounds were withdrawn the antiviral activity of penciclovir was maintained more effectively than that of aciclovir. In the plaque reduction assay, median 50% effective concentrations (ECsos) were 3.8 I1g mr" for penciclovir and 4.2 I1g rnl" for aciclovir (n =29 clinical isolat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The withdrawal of aciclovir for 18h in each 24-hour period therefore resulted in greater virus replication when measured 72h after infection than in parallel cultures treated with penciclovir. Similarly, pulse treatment with penciclovir was significantly more effective than with aciclovir in MRC-5 cells infected with clinical isolates of VZV (Bacon et al 1996a). With HSV-2 strains, pulse treatment with penciclovir was marginally more effective than aciclovir (Table 5; Inhibition of HSV by penciclovir 135 p = 0.062; n = 6 strains), although results from a preliminary study with one HSV-2 strain revealed that penciclovir was significantly more active than aciclovir at 1~g mr' (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The withdrawal of aciclovir for 18h in each 24-hour period therefore resulted in greater virus replication when measured 72h after infection than in parallel cultures treated with penciclovir. Similarly, pulse treatment with penciclovir was significantly more effective than with aciclovir in MRC-5 cells infected with clinical isolates of VZV (Bacon et al 1996a). With HSV-2 strains, pulse treatment with penciclovir was marginally more effective than aciclovir (Table 5; Inhibition of HSV by penciclovir 135 p = 0.062; n = 6 strains), although results from a preliminary study with one HSV-2 strain revealed that penciclovir was significantly more active than aciclovir at 1~g mr' (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with aciclovir (ACV), penciclovir also inhibits varicellazoster virus replication (Boyd et al, 1993;Bacon et al 1996a). Famciclovir, the oral form of penciclovir (Pue and Benet, 1993), has been approved for the treatment of herpes zoster and acute genital herpes infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, higher doses and/or increased administration frequency of valacyclovir or famciclovir would be required for efficient treatment for EHV-1 infection. However, it has been reported that the intracellular half-lives of penciclovir triphosphate are much longer than those of acyclovir triphosphate in human cells infected with herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), type 2 (HSV-2), or varicella-zoster virus (VZV) (10 hr vs. 0.7 hr, 20 hr vs. 1 hr, and 9.1 hr vs. 0.8 hr, respectively) [3,10,33]. Additionally, in both tissue culture [2] and animal infection [6,28], penciclovir has a more sustained antiviral effect than acyclovir against HSV-1 and -2, a finding that may be correlated with the difference in the stability of the 2 compounds in infected cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical advantages of these prodrugs, particularly famciclovir, relative to aciclovir are also discussed. Data from VereHodge & Cheng (1993) and Bacon et al (1996).…”
Section: Clinical Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%