1998
DOI: 10.1007/s004320050221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of tumour cell invasion by protease inhibitors: correlation with the protease profile

Abstract: The invasive potential of eight established human tumour cell lines of different origin has been studied in the Matrigel assay. Between 25% and 70% of the cells migrated through the Matrigel layer within 24 h, indicating that invasiveness varies with the cell type. Semiquantitative measurements of the proteases MMP-2 and MMP-9, and cathepsins B and L were performed in these cell lines and the cell culture media. High invasive potential was found in those cell lines expressing high levels of cathepsins B and L … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The human breast adenocarcinoma cell line MCF-7 was chosen for further analysis as it was previously used in studies of the effect of protease inhibition on cancer cell metabolism (23,24). The focus of this work was to delineate the first part of the internalization pathway by analyzing the importance of charge and hydrophobicity for uptake, as these properties have been shown to contribute to cellular internalization (26 -28) to study the subcellular localization of the internalized inhibitor and the intracellular effects of the uptake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The human breast adenocarcinoma cell line MCF-7 was chosen for further analysis as it was previously used in studies of the effect of protease inhibition on cancer cell metabolism (23,24). The focus of this work was to delineate the first part of the internalization pathway by analyzing the importance of charge and hydrophobicity for uptake, as these properties have been shown to contribute to cellular internalization (26 -28) to study the subcellular localization of the internalized inhibitor and the intracellular effects of the uptake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basic Uptake Kinetics for Cystatin C-The MCF-7 cell line was selected for detailed studies on molecular requirements for cystatin C uptake (see Introduction), partly because it has been shown that both cell permeable and non-cell-permeable lowmolecular-weight cysteine protease inhibitors have effects on its migration and invasion (23,24). To test whether cystatin C can affect such biologically relevant properties of these cells, we performed Matrigel experiments comparing cells incubated with and without cystatin C (1 M) added to the medium.…”
Section: Cystatin C Variants For Elucidation Of Structuralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ®ndings obtained in the in vitro invasion assays are in accordance with the results obtained by the selective cysteine protease inhibitors in murine squamous carcinoma cells (Coulibaly et al, 1999) and glioblastoma cells (Demchik et al, 1999), demonstrating that cathepsin B can mediate the degradation of ECM components. Kolkhorst et al (1998) found that invasiveness of tumor cell lines expressing high levels of cathepsin B are e ciently inhibited by CA074, a selective cathepsin B inhibitor. In a recent study, cathepsin B antisense-transfected human osteosarcoma cells showed a markedly lower invasiveness and motility in Matrigel invasion assays than did controls (Krueger et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these enzymes are lysosomal proteases that are involved in physiological process such as turnover of cellular proteins. Immunohistochemical and enzymatic analyses of protease expression in different tumors have shown that increased expression or changes in cell localization are important prognostic factors and correlated with tumor progression (Heck et al, 1990;Kolkhorst et al, 1998;Yan et al, 1998;Tetu et al, 1999). However, in the remodeling process, most enzymes are produced by stromal cells of the host (Crawford and Matrisian, 1996;Saren et al, 1996).…”
Section: Enzymesmentioning
confidence: 99%