2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1357-2725(03)00005-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of the catalytic activity of rhodanese by S-nitrosylation using nitric oxide donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to testing the effect of NO with respect to platelet adhesion, it was necessary to establish that NO has no effect on LDH activity. As a free radical, NO is known to react with various enzymes, which could possibly change their function and efficacy in catalysis 35, 36. Previous studies using the LDH assay to assess the biocompatibility of polymers involved evaluating only physically30, 32 or chemically29, 31 modified surfaces, not a material that releases a reactive species such as NO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior to testing the effect of NO with respect to platelet adhesion, it was necessary to establish that NO has no effect on LDH activity. As a free radical, NO is known to react with various enzymes, which could possibly change their function and efficacy in catalysis 35, 36. Previous studies using the LDH assay to assess the biocompatibility of polymers involved evaluating only physically30, 32 or chemically29, 31 modified surfaces, not a material that releases a reactive species such as NO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a free radical, NO is known to react with various enzymes, which could possibly change their function and efficacy in catalysis. 35,36 Previous studies using the LDH assay to assess the biocompatibility of polymers involved evaluating only physically 30,32 or chemically 29,31 modified surfaces, not a material that releases a reactive species such as NO. Consequently, it was crucial to verify that any ''observed'' reduction in LDH activity derived from experiments using PRP was indeed the results of less adhered platelets rather than any inhibition of LDH function in the presence of continuous NO production.…”
Section: Ldh Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the structure also revealed that the protein overexpressed in E. coli is partially both S-sulfhydrated and S-nitrosylated and that the S-sulfhydration is likely present in two conformations [12]. It has been known that S-nitrosylation and S-sulfhydration are mutually inhibitory processes, which may play important roles in H 2 S/NO signaling [13]. It has also been suspected that the ubiquity and frequent presence of the rhodanese domains in multidomain proteins implies physiological functions other than cell detoxification [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has also been suspected that the ubiquity of the rhodanese domains and their frequent presence in multidomain proteins imply physiological functions other than cell detoxification [21]. The interplay between S-sulfhydration and S-nitrosylation, which are mutually inhibitory processes, is important in H 2 S/NO signaling [23]. Therefore, it is interesting that a rhodanese domain can be found in the membrane proteome of E. coli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the physiological role of YgaP is unknown, the catalytic loop of its rhodanese domain, which includes Cys63, is essential for the sulfur transfer activity [21,22,24]. It has been shown that S-nitrosylation inactivates the function of rhodanese domains by nitrosylation of the catalytically active Cys [20,23]. Here, we investigated structural and dynamical changes affected by S-nitrosylation in vitro by both NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%