2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07087.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of the Amygdala: Key to Pathological States?

Abstract: The amygdala plays an important role in associating sensory stimuli with aversive or appetitive outcomes. Conditioning procedures potentiate inputs to the amygdala, which facilitate emotional responses via subcortical and cortical outputs. Powerful inhibitory circuits exist that control expression of conditioned responses in the amygdala, including inhibition from prefrontal cortex. Deficient inhibitory tone in the amygdala could lead to overexpression of conditioned responses, producing pathological states su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
211
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
13
211
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present task, resilience may have resulted in a paradoxical impairment in the ability to anticipate punishment given specific predictive stimuli. Resilience has been hypothesized to result from cortical, top-down control (from the prefrontal cortex, PFC) over subcortical brain regions that mediate aversive conditioning (eg the amygdala and the dorsal raphe nucleus) (Quirk and Gehlert, 2003;Amat et al, 2005;Pezawas et al, 2005;Urry et al, 2006;Yehuda et al, 2006). In keeping with this hypothesis, recent neuroimaging observations suggest that the PFC controls amygdala activity when subjects are presented with negatively valenced stimuli (Ochsner et al, 2002;Phelps and LeDoux, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present task, resilience may have resulted in a paradoxical impairment in the ability to anticipate punishment given specific predictive stimuli. Resilience has been hypothesized to result from cortical, top-down control (from the prefrontal cortex, PFC) over subcortical brain regions that mediate aversive conditioning (eg the amygdala and the dorsal raphe nucleus) (Quirk and Gehlert, 2003;Amat et al, 2005;Pezawas et al, 2005;Urry et al, 2006;Yehuda et al, 2006). In keeping with this hypothesis, recent neuroimaging observations suggest that the PFC controls amygdala activity when subjects are presented with negatively valenced stimuli (Ochsner et al, 2002;Phelps and LeDoux, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A late-developing brain center for socioemotional control (Giedd et al, 1996;Deoni et al, 2011), the amygdala is implicated in the pathophysiology of neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders (Quirk and Gehlert, 2003;Amaral et al, 2008;Benes, 2010;Felix-Ortiz and Tye, 2014). Adult amygdala function and emotional behavior are altered by PS (Weinstock, 2008;Sadler et al, 2011), and several studies have identified effects of PS on the developing amygdala (Kraszpulski et al, 2006;Laloux et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of individuals with suicide-ideations, this may link with the immediate of not experiencing the severe negative pain or the belief that death will be a solution. Their ability to perceive futuristic rewards may be inhibited along with possible inhibition of fear, although research suggests that suicide attempters show impaired probabilistic reversal learning compared to non-suicide depressed adults [20], it might be this ability that shifts the balance from ideation to attempting to end one's life [14].…”
Section: The Effect Of Moodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuroimaging evidence suggests attentional control and cognitive change may be two types of cognitive regulation [13]. This form of emotional regulation involves regions such as the pre-frontal cortex (PFC), orbito-frontal cortex (OFC) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) [13][14][15] Davidson 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%