2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2016.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of RORα/γ suppresses atherosclerosis via inhibition of both cholesterol absorption and inflammation

Abstract: ObjectiveCardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of mortality in Western countries. Atherosclerosis is a multi-step inflammatory disease characterized at early stages by accumulation of cholesterol in the arterial wall followed by recruitment of immune cells. We sought to determine if pharmacological suppression of RORα/γ activity is beneficial in treatment of atherosclerosis.MethodsTo identify the role of RORα and RORγ in atherosclerosis, we used the LDL-R−/− mouse model of atherosclerosis placed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(29 reference statements)
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. (49) showing that SR1001 has no effect on Treg development in vitro, but consistent with in vivo studies (7,48), here we show that SR1001 increases lung Tregs, suggesting an additional mechanism by which SR1001 could have prevented and reversed CH-induced PH (12). However, several lines of evidence support T H 17 cells as the major effector inflammatory cells following CH, including the following: 1) the majority of perivascular T cells were IL-17A ϩ cells; 2) SR1001 did not affect the number of perivascular CD3 ϩ T cells in normoxic mice while preventing CH-induced perivascular inflammation; and 3) CH did not increase lung Tregs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…al. (49) showing that SR1001 has no effect on Treg development in vitro, but consistent with in vivo studies (7,48), here we show that SR1001 increases lung Tregs, suggesting an additional mechanism by which SR1001 could have prevented and reversed CH-induced PH (12). However, several lines of evidence support T H 17 cells as the major effector inflammatory cells following CH, including the following: 1) the majority of perivascular T cells were IL-17A ϩ cells; 2) SR1001 did not affect the number of perivascular CD3 ϩ T cells in normoxic mice while preventing CH-induced perivascular inflammation; and 3) CH did not increase lung Tregs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Moreover, the treatment of liver macrophages with synthetic RORα ligands was found to modulate nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH); activation of RORα by SR1078 [52] as an RORα agonist results in protection against NASH and loss of RORα function, whereas inhibition of RORα function by SR3335 [25], an RORα-selective inverse agonist, results in the progression of NASH [53]. Further pharmacological and pathophysiological studies are currently investigating the development of candidate RORα ligands for various applications [54,55]. In pharmacological therapies involving nuclear receptor ligands, increased activity of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) in response to various peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) might explain the hypotriglyceridemic effects of fibrates, thiazolindinediones, and fatty acids, which are known activators (and/or ligands) of the various PPARs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In peritoneal cells lacking BMAL1 (transcriptional factor of REV-ERBα), phosphorylation of p65 after LPS treatment was increased to levels greater than those noted in control cells [33]. Knockout of the retinoid-related orphan receptoralpha (RORα), which is a potent competitive repressor of REV-ERBα, decreases cytokine production, and RORα inhibition decreases the inflammatory profile and suppresses atherosclerosis [34]. In contrast, REV-ERBα activation by SR9009 decreases cytokine production via inhibition of the NF-κB pathway and promotes survival in myocardial inaction animals [35], suggesting inhibitory effects of REV-ERBα on the NF-κB pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%