2006
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e06-04-0318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of Ribosome Recruitment Induces Stress Granule Formation Independently of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2α Phosphorylation

Abstract: Cytoplasmic aggregates known as stress granules (SGs) arise as a consequence of cellular stress and contain stalled translation preinitiation complexes. These foci are thought to serve as sites of mRNA storage or triage during the cell stress response. SG formation has been shown to require induction of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)2␣ phosphorylation. Herein, we investigate the potential role of other initiation factors in this process and demonstrate that interfering with eIF4A activity, an RNA helicase … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
316
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(325 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
316
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidently, further studies are required to dissect the function of ATXN2 in translational regulation and how alterations in the intracellular ATXN2 level affect translational processes or potentially mRNA decay. On the one hand, one could speculate that ATXN2 interferes with SG and P-body structures by impairing the correct ribosome assembly granted by RNA helicases, which is required for the induction of SGs (Ripmaster et al, 1992;Mazroui et al, 2006). Moreover, one needs to elucidate in more detail the aspect whether the observed impairment of SG assembly in cells with reduced ATXN2 concentration could potentially arise due to alterations in the intracellular PAPB concentration as well, because PAPB is known to be a translational enhancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidently, further studies are required to dissect the function of ATXN2 in translational regulation and how alterations in the intracellular ATXN2 level affect translational processes or potentially mRNA decay. On the one hand, one could speculate that ATXN2 interferes with SG and P-body structures by impairing the correct ribosome assembly granted by RNA helicases, which is required for the induction of SGs (Ripmaster et al, 1992;Mazroui et al, 2006). Moreover, one needs to elucidate in more detail the aspect whether the observed impairment of SG assembly in cells with reduced ATXN2 concentration could potentially arise due to alterations in the intracellular PAPB concentration as well, because PAPB is known to be a translational enhancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causes a decline of the ternary complex eIF2-GTP-tRNA Met and an accumulation of the 48S* preinitiation complex resulting in the disassembly of polysomes and the assembly of SGs (Anderson and Kedersha, 2002a,b;Kedersha and Anderson, 2002). However, recently eIF2␣ phosphorylation-independent pathways, which target translation initiation, have been reported (Dang et al, 2006;Mazroui et al, 2006). Interference with the activity of another initiation factor, eIF4A, induces assembly of SGs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were fixed, and immunofluorescence was performed as described (19). Anti-HuR monoclonal antibody (3A2) (20), anti-G3BP (Ras GTPase-activating protein SH3 domain-binding protein) polyclonal antibody (23), and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (Molecular Probes) were used along with DAPI stain. Images were taken at room temperature with a ϫ63 oil objective using an Axiovert 200M microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc.) as described previously (6).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in heat-shocked cells the canonical translation initiation factor eIF4G is bound by Hsp27 and recruited to SGs, thus inactivating the cap binding complex, eIF4F, and inhibiting translation initiation (9). More recently hippuristanol and pateamine A, two compounds that inhibit translation initiation via interaction with eIF4A, another eIF4F component, were found to promote the formation of SGs (5,6,27,29). Notably, SG formation by pateamine A does not require phosphorylation of eIF2␣ (10,29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently hippuristanol and pateamine A, two compounds that inhibit translation initiation via interaction with eIF4A, another eIF4F component, were found to promote the formation of SGs (5,6,27,29). Notably, SG formation by pateamine A does not require phosphorylation of eIF2␣ (10,29). Similarly, poliovirus, which inhibits host protein synthesis via cleavage of eIF4G and PABP, also induces SG formation without significant eIF2␣ phosphorylation (29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%