Inhibition of return in response to gaze cues: The roles of time course and fixation cue

Frischen, Alexandra; Smilek, Daniel; Eastwood, John D.; Tipper, Steven P.

doi:10.1080/13506280601112493

Cited by 75 publications

(78 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Interestingly, our experiment had a relatively large number of catch trials (16%). Inhibition has also been found at very long SOAs (>2 sec; Frischen, Smilek, Eastwood, & Tipper, 2007; but see McKee, Christie, & Klein, 2007). However, these inhibitory phenomena are remarkably different from the classic IOR effect after peripheral cueing.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Normal and Impaired Reflexive Orienting of Attention after Central Nonpredictive Cues

Bonato

Priftis

Marenzi

et al. 2009

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract& Recent studies suggest that stimuli with directional meaning can trigger lateral shifts of visuospatial attention when centrally presented as noninformative cues. We investigated covert orienting in healthy participants and in a group of 17 right braindamaged patients (9 with hemispatial neglect) comparing arrows, eye gaze, and digits as central nonpredictive cues in a detection task. Orienting effects elicited by arrows and eye gaze were overall consistent in healthy participants and in right braindamaged patients, whereas digit cues were ineffective. Moreover, patients with neglect showed, at the shortest delay between cue and target, a disengage deficit for arrow cueing whose magnitude was predicted by neglect severity. We conclude that the peculiar form of attentional orienting triggered by the directional meaning of arrow cues presents some features previously thought to characterize only the stimulus-driven (exogenous) orienting to noninformative peripheral cues. &

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Normal and Impaired Reflexive Orienting of Attention after Central Nonpredictive Cues

Bonato

Priftis

Marenzi

et al. 2009

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…So the facilitatory effect of a peripheral transient cue becomes inhibitory after about 300 ms. At much longer SOAs (e.g., 1,200 ms), gaze cueing has also been shown to cause inhibitory effects (Frischen & Tipper, 2004). However, even at these longer SOAs, this effect has not proved reliable without the presence of a central transient event to redirect attention away from the target location (Frischen, Smilek, Eastwood, & Tipper, 2007;McKee, Christie, & Klein, 2007).…”

Section: Covert Attentionmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…The presence of IOR was striking in this context as this phenomenon had not been demonstrated following an action cue, and only two studies have done so in response to gaze cues (Frischen, Smilek, et al, 2007;Frischen & Tipper, 2004). Of these, it was determined that long cue-target intervals were required, alongside a centrally presented perceptual transient such as the gaze cue offset or an independent transient event (see Orienting to Social Cues: The Case of Gaze section).…”

Section: Social Inhibition Of Returnmentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite considerable interest in both action perception and social attention over the last 2 decades, there has been surprisingly little investigation concerning how the manual actions of other humans orient visual attention. The present review draws together studies that have measured the orienting of attention, following observation of another's goal-directed action. Our review proposes that, in line with the literature on eye gaze, action is a particularly strong orienting cue for the visual system. However, we additionally suggest that action may orient visual attention using mechanisms, which gaze direction does not (i.e., neural direct mapping and corepresentation). Finally, we review the implications of these gaze-independent mechanisms for the study of attention to action. We suggest that our understanding of attention to action may benefit from being studied in the context of joint action paradigms, where the role of higher level action goals and social factors can be investigated.

show abstract

“…It is well known that another person's gaze shift produces a shift of an observer's visual attention in the gazed direction (e.g., Downing, Dodds, & Bray, 2004;Driver, Davis, Ricciardelli, Kidd, Maxwell, & Baron-Cohen, 1999;Frischen, Smilek, Eastwood, & Tipper, 2007;Frischen & Tipper, 2006;Langton & Bruce, 1999). Specifically, observers tend to respond to targets at which the gaze is directed more quickly and accurately than to those at which the gaze is not directed.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic Gaze Cueing Alters the Perceived Direction of Apparent Motion

Yamada

Kawabe

Miura

2008

PSYCHOLOGIA -An International Journal of Psychological Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Visual attention automatically shifts in the direction of another person's gaze shift. However, this gaze cueing effect has been tested only in static situations. In the present study, we examined whether dynamic gaze cueing, triggered by the dynamic gaze shift of another person, could alter the perceived direction of apparent motion. In Experiment 1, we presented a drifting or counterphased flickering sinusoidal grating in the upper visual field and a pictorial face stimulus with its eyes smoothly moved towards the left or right side of the grating in the lower visual field. Observers were asked to report the perceived motion direction in the grating; consequently, it was biased in the direction of the gaze shift. In Experiment 2, we ruled out the possibility of motion capture due to the motion signals in the eyes as a source of bias in the previous experiment. From these results, we concluded that dynamic gaze cueing altered perceived motion direction, and we proposed the usefulness of our approach in exploring gaze perception in dynamic environments.

show abstract

Inhibition of return in response to gaze cues: The roles of time course and fixation cue

Cited by 75 publications

References 25 publications

Normal and Impaired Reflexive Orienting of Attention after Central Nonpredictive Cues

Normal and Impaired Reflexive Orienting of Attention after Central Nonpredictive Cues

Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting

Dynamic Gaze Cueing Alters the Perceived Direction of Apparent Motion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About