2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.34904.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of Persistent Sodium Current Fraction and Voltage‐gated L‐type Calcium Current by Propofol in Cortical Neurons: Implications for Its Antiepileptic Activity

Abstract: Summary:Purpose: Although it is widely used in clinical practice, the mechanisms of action of 2,6-di-isopropylphenol (propofol) are not completely understood. We examined the electrophysiologic effects of propofol on an in vitro model of epileptic activity obtained from a slice preparation.Methods:The effects of propofol were tested both on membrane properties and on epileptiform events consisting of longlasting, paroxysmal depolarization shifts (PDSs) induced by reducing the magnesium concentration from the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
42
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Latency of ST-EPSCs was unaffected by 30 µM propofol. In contrast, in cortical neurons, sodium channels, spiking and nerve conduction are inhibited by low micromolar propofol concentrations (Rehberg & Duch, 1999;Bieda & MacIver, 2004;Martella et al, 2005;Jones et al, 2007). We conclude that the afferent axon and terminal excitation process is remarkably insensitive to propofol and this may reflect the expression of a particular complement of ion channels within peripheral afferent neuron axons (Schild et al, 1994;Schild & Kunze, 1995).…”
Section: Propofol Does Not Affect Glutamatergic Transmission In Seconmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Latency of ST-EPSCs was unaffected by 30 µM propofol. In contrast, in cortical neurons, sodium channels, spiking and nerve conduction are inhibited by low micromolar propofol concentrations (Rehberg & Duch, 1999;Bieda & MacIver, 2004;Martella et al, 2005;Jones et al, 2007). We conclude that the afferent axon and terminal excitation process is remarkably insensitive to propofol and this may reflect the expression of a particular complement of ion channels within peripheral afferent neuron axons (Schild et al, 1994;Schild & Kunze, 1995).…”
Section: Propofol Does Not Affect Glutamatergic Transmission In Seconmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Thus, on average, the mean amplitude of the first evoked ST-EPSC (ST-EPSC 1 ) remained unchanged from control up to the highest concentration tested propofol (30 µM, Figure 5B). Although in cortical neurons sodium channels, spiking and nerve conduction are inhibited by low micromolar propofol concentrations (Rehberg & Duch, 1999;Bieda & MacIver, 2004;Martella et al, 2005;Jones et al, 2007), ST-EPSC latency remained constant during propofol (p=0.958, n=5, Figure 5C), a finding that suggests that sensory axon conduction and glutamate release are unimpeded by the anesthetic. Likewise, following pharmacological isolation of sEPSCs with gabazine, propofol did not alter decay-time constants, amplitudes, frequencies or the holding current at any concentration tested (n=6, Figure 5D).…”
Section: St Afferent and Glutamatergic Synaptic Transmission Is Propomentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our previous study showed that in healthy volunteers, propofol significantly influenced release of these neurotransmitters, in different brain regions (Zhang et al, 2009). Furthermore, it is reported that propofol could modulate the function of sodium and calcium channels (Martella et al, 2005) and endocannabinoid system (Guindon et al, 2007). However, in the intact central nervous system (CNS), especially in human beings during anesthesia, the functional target of propofol is still a mystery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…general anesthetic; however, at subanesthetic doses, propofol is used clinically during refractory status epilepticus, a critical medical emergency with mortality rates as high as 76% in elderly patients (Prasad et al, 2001;Claassen et al, 2002;Marik and Varon, 2004;Rossetti et al, 2004). Propofol has been shown to inhibit sodium currents in mammalian cell lines expressing rat Na v 1.2 (Rehberg and Duch, 1999), to activate GABA currents in hippocampal neurons (Orser et al, 1994), and to inhibit L-type calcium currents in cortical neurons (Martella et al, 2005). However, its modulation of sodium currents (Martella et al, 2005) has been suggested to be important for its AED activity in both veratridine-induced seizures (Otoom and Hasan, 2004) and amygdala-kindled rats (Borowicz and Czuczwar, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propofol has been shown to inhibit sodium currents in mammalian cell lines expressing rat Na v 1.2 (Rehberg and Duch, 1999), to activate GABA currents in hippocampal neurons (Orser et al, 1994), and to inhibit L-type calcium currents in cortical neurons (Martella et al, 2005). However, its modulation of sodium currents (Martella et al, 2005) has been suggested to be important for its AED activity in both veratridine-induced seizures (Otoom and Hasan, 2004) and amygdala-kindled rats (Borowicz and Czuczwar, 2003). Although the mechanisms of action for propofol remain unclear, it continues to be an effective alternative to barbiturates and first line AEDs when treating refractory status epilepticus (Rossetti et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%