2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of Pain and Pain-Related Brain Activity by Heterotopic Noxious Counter-Stimulation and Selective Attention in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, although the main results are consistent with our hypotheses and with previous findings, the lack of group difference for some measures should be interpreted with caution and deserves further investigations. For example, the lack of NFR inhibition by HNCS in the control group may be due to a lack of power and is not consistent with our previous study that included 31 participants [27]. However, the NFR results are consistent with some of our previous studies, in which NFR was not significantly inhibited by HNCS in healthy volunteers [28,81].…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Therefore, although the main results are consistent with our hypotheses and with previous findings, the lack of group difference for some measures should be interpreted with caution and deserves further investigations. For example, the lack of NFR inhibition by HNCS in the control group may be due to a lack of power and is not consistent with our previous study that included 31 participants [27]. However, the NFR results are consistent with some of our previous studies, in which NFR was not significantly inhibited by HNCS in healthy volunteers [28,81].…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Degreased skin over the retromalleolar path of the sural nerve was stimulated by a pair of custom-made surface electrodes (1 cm 2 ; 2 cm inter-electrode distance). The right and left RIII-reflex thresholds were determined separately using the staircase method including 4 series of stimuli of increasing and decreasing intensity, as in our previous studies 72,73 . Stimulus intensity was then adjusted individually to 60%, 120% or 140% of RIII-reflex threshold depending on the experimental condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Right RIII-reflex data were analyzed with Acknowledge 4.1.1 software. Raw EMG recordings were full-wave rectified and the resulting signal was used to quantify the amplitude of the RIII-reflex to each shock by extracting the integral value between 90–180 ms after the stimulus onset, as in our previous studies 72,73 . This amplitude was normalized within each subject for each shock using T scores, mean-centered at 50.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Journal of Pain Research 2021:14 methodological modification allows for widening the scope of CPM applications to cases with altered or limited consciousness and vigilance, cognitive impairment, aphasic problems and dementia. The available electrophysiological alternatives quantifying the modulatory CPM effect on the test stimulus by assessing nociceptive flexion reflexes 23 or nociceptive brain potentials [24][25][26] are limited to very brief stimuli with a very immediate onset that do not mirror most clinical pain states. The use of facial responses allows application of clinically more relevant stimuli and responses.…”
Section: Dovepressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Moreover, in a few recent studies, nociceptive brain potentials were also used as an alternative method for CPM inhibition. [24][25][26] NFR and brain potentials can, however, only be elicited by very brief stimuli as produced by electrical current, short heat pulses and nasal gas puffs, that show little resemble to clinical pain states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%