2014
DOI: 10.4161/cbt.28876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of Notch signaling alters the phenotype of orthotopic tumors formed from glioblastoma multiforme neurosphere cells but does not hamper intracranial tumor growth regardless of endogene Notch pathway signature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In glioma stem cells (GSCs), Notch signaling is highly activated and contributes to maintaining stem cell-like properties [28]. The γ-secretase inhibitor prevents the release of the active NICD from the receptor and results in repression of proliferation and neurosphere formation, as well as promoting apoptosis in GBM cells [29,30]. Additionally, P75 NTR is upregulated in GBM and mediates the function of pro-BDNF to inhibit glioma cell growth [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In glioma stem cells (GSCs), Notch signaling is highly activated and contributes to maintaining stem cell-like properties [28]. The γ-secretase inhibitor prevents the release of the active NICD from the receptor and results in repression of proliferation and neurosphere formation, as well as promoting apoptosis in GBM cells [29,30]. Additionally, P75 NTR is upregulated in GBM and mediates the function of pro-BDNF to inhibit glioma cell growth [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, TRPM7 levels correlate with those of Notch1, Jagged1, Hey2, and survivin [124]. Neurosphere cultures with high Notch1 levels show a more infiltrative phenotype when compared to Notch1 low cultures [126]; furthermore, the suppression of cell migration, tumor invasion, and angiogenesis can be achieved by targeting the urokinase-type plasminogen activator/urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPA/uPAR) system in order to inhibit Notch-signaling-induced AKT, NF-κB, and ERK pathways [127]. The oncogenic role of Notch1 can also be due to the infection of human cytomegalovirus, which upregulates Notch1, ATF5 (an anti-apoptotic protein already highly expressed in Glioblastoma), and stem cell markers CD133, nestin, SOX2, OCT4, KLF4, and BMI-1 [128].…”
Section: Notch Signaling and Glioblastomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suppression of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis is mediated by the decrease of NF-κB (p65) expression through Notch inhibition [105]. Glioblastoma neurospheres with high Notch activity are more sensitive to DAPT and DAPT-treated cultures and show a more differentiated state and low Hes5 levels [126,146,147]. The combined treatment of DAPT with Iressa, an EGFR inhibitor, reduces VEGF expression and secretion when compared to single treatments.…”
Section: Notch Signaling and Glioblastomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brain cancer cell lines, it was established that the suppression of Notch signaling with DAPT inhibited hypoxia-induced GSC expansion [ 41 ]; abolished the effects of STC1 on N1-ICD production, SOX2 expression, and the sphere-forming capacity [ 42 ]; reduced the CSC of CD133 + and inhibited the proliferation of SHG-44 cells [ 43 ]; suppressed the transition from CD1331/CD1442 to double-positive (DP) [ 44 ]; inhibited cell growth and reduced the sphere formation capacity in glioblastoma neurosphere cultures [ 45 ]; and downregulated HIF-1α and hes1, reduced the number of nestin + cells, increased the number of β-III-tubulin + cells, and enhanced MKI67 and neuronal differentiation [ 46 ]. However, one study showed that DAPT treatment reduced brain CSCs, but had no survival benefit for mice injected with DAPT-treated GBM neurosphere cells [ 47 ].…”
Section: Anticancer Activities Of Gsis Against Cscsmentioning
confidence: 99%