2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of influenza A virus replication by influenza B virus nucleoprotein: An insight into interference between influenza A and B viruses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4) (21, 78). However, our and previous results indicate that the NP of influenza B virus inhibits type A RdRp activity (56). This mechanism could clearly account for the lack of segment reassortment between influenza A and B viruses but does not explain why influenza A viruses carrying influenza B virus segments in the absence of influenza B virus NP cannot be generated.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4) (21, 78). However, our and previous results indicate that the NP of influenza B virus inhibits type A RdRp activity (56). This mechanism could clearly account for the lack of segment reassortment between influenza A and B viruses but does not explain why influenza A viruses carrying influenza B virus segments in the absence of influenza B virus NP cannot be generated.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Other discrepancies that might impede heterotypic reassortment could include the inhibitory effect of influenza B virus NP on influenza A virus replication (56). Indeed, we observed that coexpression of influenza B virus NP inhibited IAV MG expression, whereas that of the NP of another negative-stranded RNA virus (LCMV) did not (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Reporter-expressing sciIAVs ΔNA were developed as vaccine candidates (Shinya et al, 2004), to evaluate viral attachment to the host cell (Rimmelzwaan et al, 2007), rate of co-infections (Bodewes et al, 2012), as a tool for NAb screening (Rimmelzwaan et al, 2011), or for inhibition during intertypic infection (Wanitchang et al, 2012). Although recombinant sciIAV lacking NA enzymatic activity has similar growth kinetics as WT virus in the presence of exogenous Vibrio cholerae sialidase, sciIAV ΔNA grows with reduced replication levels compared with WT virus lacking enzyme supplementation, thus it can be considered a pseudo-sciIAV (our unpublished results) (Fujii et al, 2003; Inagaki et al, 2012).…”
Section: Single-cycle Infectious Influenza a Viruses (Sciiav)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are contradicting reports concerning the role of the N-terminal region of BNP in terms of its effect on BNP cellular distribution and the effect this likely has on the ability of BNP to support transcription and replication of a virus-like RNA (14,24,25). None of the previous studies were performed in the context of viral infection but by using protein expression methods in which intracellular conditions are significantly different from those during infection (27,28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work reported that this N-terminal extension is not essential for nuclear accumulation of BNP or for the protein to function in an in vitro transcription/replication assay (14). More recent studies have reported conflicting evidence demonstrating that multiple regions of the N-terminal extension are required for efficient nuclear import of BNP (24,25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%