1971
DOI: 10.1016/0048-3575(71)90173-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of housefly microsomal epoxidase by the eye pigment, xanthommatin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pellet was resuspended with 25/~1 with resuspension buffer by repeated gentle aspiration into a 200/~1 plastic disposable pipet and stored at -80 ~ Protein assays were performed according to Bradford (1976). Cytochrome P450 reductase assays were done according to Schonbrod and Terriere (1972). Ethoxycoumarin-O-deethylase (ECOD) activity was determined by the method of Lee and Scott (1989b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pellet was resuspended with 25/~1 with resuspension buffer by repeated gentle aspiration into a 200/~1 plastic disposable pipet and stored at -80 ~ Protein assays were performed according to Bradford (1976). Cytochrome P450 reductase assays were done according to Schonbrod and Terriere (1972). Ethoxycoumarin-O-deethylase (ECOD) activity was determined by the method of Lee and Scott (1989b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsome preparations from some species may be further complicated by the presence of endogenous inhibitors of microsomal oxidases. Notable cases have been reported from insect studies (Wilkinson and Brattsten, 1972), where materials such as eye pigment (xanthommatin) (Schonbrod and Terriere, 1971;Wilson and Hodgson, 1972) and digestive proteases of the gut (Krieger and Wilkinson, 1970;Brattsten and Wilkinson, 1973) often present serious problems. The procedure providing the highest recovery of microsomal oxidase activity often results in considerable contamination of the microsomal fraction with extramicrosomal components.…”
Section: Morphological Chemical and Enzymatic Composition Of Micmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, some organisms contain proteases and/or inhibiting agents in the eyes and/or guts (Gilbert & Wilkinson, ; Schonbrod & Terriere, ), which inhibit the enzymes before activity measurements can be performed. Agents interfering specifically with CYP activity have been identified in, for example, gut tissue from the honeybee, Apis mellifera (Gilbert & Wilkinson, ), southern armyworm, Prodenia eridania (Krieger & Wilkinson, ), and the house cricket, Acheta domesticus (Benke & Wilkinson, ), and in the eyes of the housefly, Musca domestica (Schonbrod & Terriere, ). CYP enzymes oxidize their substrates using NADPH as the electron donor through specific reductase enzymes (Shaik & De Visser, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteolytic gut enzymes interfere with CYP activity by releasing NADPH‐cytochrome c reductase from the microsomal membrane and hence disrupt the NADPH‐dependent reduction in enzyme‐substrate complex (Orrenius, Berggren, Moldéus, & Krieger, ). The eye pigment xanthommatin, on the other hand, has been established as a CYP inhibitor due to its ability to impede the flow of electrons from NADPH to cytochrome P450 (Schonbrod & Terriere, ). The interference of proteolytic enzymes in enzyme assays may be overcome by addition of specifically designed protective protease inhibitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%